Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

INSIDER - STRIKES, SINGLE STATUS AND SAVINGS

  • Comment
Strikes are hard work...
Strikes are hard work

Angry trade unions are not the only ones getting fired up by the proposed changes to the Local Government Pensions Scheme. HR directors are shouting that they feel their hands are tied.

How will they deal with a national strike? They are faced with a balancing act - putting across their council's views on pension reform while trying to avoid long-term harm to their relations with the unions.

They will also have to keep services going. As one HR director explains: 'This isn't actually so much a pensions issue. The real issue is the amount of planning, time and organisation required in a council when services are affected through strikes.'

Whose idea was single status?

From one striking issue to another, HR directors are anxious about single status - the thankless task of getting all staff on the same pay and conditions system.

Issues are still outstanding around equal pay and grading, especially in relation to bonus payments for, among others, bin men and street cleaners.

The pressure is on to secure an acceptable and affordable agreement by April 2007. Some fear the implementation of a new pay structure would jeopardise the council's ability to recruit and retain staff, while others are wearily resigned to more run-ins with the unions over equal pay claims.

HR directors cite this as a 'massive' issue. 'It is time-consuming, complex, an on-going risk, and is putting councils under severe financial pressure,' says one. Another chips in: 'There is a need to conduct an equal pay review - but that's balanced against the realities of a labour market that is far from equal.'

Unison's policy is that members must be balloted on any single status proposal. 'If there is a no vote, we're back to square one,' groans one director.

Inefficient efficiencies

As if retention and recruitment isn't enough of a problem, the push to make efficiency savings is having a serious impact on morale, with senior managers crumbling at the thought of yet more cost-saving initiatives.

Some managers complain that their organisation seems incapable of prioritising, bogging them down in endless schemes which distract them from real work.

Do I stay or do I go?

Talk of restructuring isn't helping either. 'Following David Miliband's briefings on the benefits of unitary authorities, how can we continue to motivate, retain and maintain performance levels within a district?' questions one. Local government reorganisation is washing workforce planning down the drain.

Views are published anonymously. To take part in the HR insider, e-mail jennifer.sprinks@emap.com

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.