Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOUND IN ABERDEEN BULLYING ALLEGATIONS

  • Comment
The bullying allegations at Aberdeen DC were found to have 'insufficient evidence' according to the report from Gor...
The bullying allegations at Aberdeen DC were found to have 'insufficient evidence' according to the report from Gordon Coutts QC presented yesterday to a Special Aberdeen Council Committee.

In the report Mr Coutts said the approach he had taken was to discover if there was prima facie evidence of the council staff which the council should deal with under their existing procedures. He also considered the term 'bullying'' to be misleading because it focuses on motive and not on conduct.

Mr Coutts did find evidence of unacceptable behaviour by some employees. On the working atmosphere of the council Mr Coutts said: 'The inquiry did reveal a substantial lack of confidence in and trust of their collegues. Everyone appeared to be of the view that they required to 'watch their backs'

The report contains several recommendations including the appointment of a Welfare officer who would have 'a sufficient measure of independence'. The allgations will now be addressed at a council disiplinary committee.
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.