Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The value enigma – false dawn or resurgence?

Ritu Vohora
  • Comment

This year has not quite followed the script: investors were expecting improving economic growth and rising inflation to be accompanied by steeper yield curves, with the more defensive/quality stocks and so-called ‘bond proxies’ coming under pressure as bond yields rose.

The strong rebound in value in the second half of 2016 was heralded as the style’s return to favour alongside a more pro-cyclical market regime. Instead, with the exception of a couple of months, value stocks have generally lagged in 2017 as risk aversion has been more prevalent.

So was last year’s value revival a brief outlier in the post-GFC underperformance versus quality and growth? Or is there still structural support for a long-term value comeback?

Fundamentals are supportive - value remains cheap globally and spreads remain very wide. The spread between the cheapest and the most expensive stocks are at levels last seen during the tech bubble and among the widest seen in the past 50 years. There is significant scope for this gap to narrow as the global economy continues to strengthen. Given the extreme valuation divergence, catalysts for value’s resurgence are not always necessary, and the scope for mean reversion could be enough on its own. However, a number of factors could also provide a positive tailwind during the medium term:

1. Reflation

Heightened inflation expectations have been under the spotlight recently, and in particular inflation’s relationship with value. A positive relationship between the two holds over the long term. In times of deflation, prices of goods and services head downwards and returns look better the further out you look. This is why growth businesses, and particularly stable quality companies with pricing power, have been prized of late and been great performers. The case for reflation remains intact, however, and a gentle pick-up bodes well for value investing. Generally speaking, out-of-favour stocks trading at a discount to the market tend to profit sooner (once intrinsic value is realised) as opposed to more expensive stable or growth businesses. Within an inflationary environment (whereby capital invested today will be worth less in the future), higher valued and longer duration (growth) stocks are therefore likely to take longer to provide a return. The opposite is true for value stocks, which could see their underperformance reversed should inflation pick up.

a century of value driven correlation

A century of value driven correlation


2. Bond yields

A key driver of value’s decade of relative underperformance has been falling bond yields, with a close correlation between the two. Changes in bond yields affect stocks differently given companies generate returns over different time lines. As with bond markets, longer-duration assets are more negatively impacted by rising rates. Investors therefore prefer current cash flows to distant ones when bond yields are higher, while they are more comfortable waiting for future profits when yields are low. As a result, higher bond yields pose a greater headwind to growth stocks than to value ones. With robust economic data across the world fuelling the global reflation trade and a continued move upward in bond yields (albeit at a slower pace) this should be supportive of value.

bond yields are an important driver of style performance

Bond yields are an important driver of style performance

Global value vs quality stocks vs 10-year US bond yields (%)

3. Credit spreads

Credit spreads have been tightening since mid-April. The difference in how much corporates are compensating lenders over government bonds is shrinking and has been for some time. Tighter credit spreads are the result of global central banks maintaining low borrowing costs in the hope of encouraging economic growth. While there is contention around the effectiveness of monetary policy efforts, the risk/reward in credit is broadly indicative of an impending cyclical rotation away from ‘safe’ assets. History suggests this supports value investing as investors look to take on more risk.

value outperformed during a long period of tight credit spreads

Value outperformed during a long period of tight credit spreads

Relative performance of global value vs. quality stocks and Global Corporate Investment Grade spread (1999-2007) Period between 1999-2007 highlights the last significant period of time where credit spreads remained tight and value outperformed.

4. Earnings

A key indicator of continued cyclical strength comes from corporates, which have delivered strong earnings performance so far this year. Relative EPS momentum has been improving for value stocks in absolute terms and against typically more defensive quality stocks. Currently, global sectors with above-average earnings and price momentum are all cyclical, including banks, industrials, tech and materials. In contrast, the more traditionally defensive sectors all have below-average earnings and price momentum, including consumer staples, utilities, and telecoms. History suggests stocks with relatively strong earnings and price momentum tend to outperform.

Further upside potential for value

Taken together, these factors should be supportive of a broad-based cyclical rotation and value’s outperformance. However, it is the ‘valuation of value’ which remains the cornerstone of the value argument. Given today’s exceptionally wide valuation spreads, it would not take much for some form of mean reversion to occur. Valuation alone could be the catalyst.

Ritu Vohora, equities investment director, M&G Investments

Column sponsored and supplied by M&G Investments

Mand g


This article reflects M&G’s present opinions of current market conditions. They are subject to change without notice and involve a number of assumptions which may not prove valid. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The distribution of this article does not constitute an offer or solicitation and should not be considered as investment advice or as a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information given in this article has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable although M&G does not accept liability for the accuracy of the contents.

M&G Investments is a business name of M&G Investment Management Limited and is used by other companies within the Prudential Group. M&G Investment Management Limited is registered in England and Wales under number 936683 with its registered office at Laurence Pountney Hill, London EC4R 0HH. M&G Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. IM886 10/17


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.