Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Councils have been handed an extra£340m by the chancellor in the expectation that council tax increases next year ...
Councils have been handed an extra £340m by the chancellor in the expectation that council tax increases next year will be kept to 'low single figures'.

The move, announced in his pre-Budget report, effectively closes the £800m funding gap identified by the Local Government Association prior to last month's finance settlement. It is being interpreted as an attempt by government to ensure the blame for any large council tax rises next year falls squarely on councils.

It comes in the wake of a damning Audit Commission report which pinned much of the blame for last year's increases on central government (LGC, 5 December).

Both the Treasury and the LGA dismissed any link between the new cash and the commission's report. But one senior local government source said the report had heightened ministers' fear of an electoral backlash over large council tax increases next year: 'The government is doing everything in its power to ensure that if there are substantial council tax increases, the finger of blame is not pointed at them,' he said.

Chancellor Gordon Brown said the new cash, which is not ring fenced, would bring the total available to English councils to £3.6bn more than last year.

Deputy prime minister John Prescott reiterated his threat to use capping powers where necessary, although he said he will take the results of local referendums into account.

He said: 'The government, and council tax payers, now expect councils to deliver. Given this significant investment in local services and the scope for efficiency improvements, it is my view that next year local authorities can and should deliver council tax increases in low single figures.

'When considering whether to cap authorities, I would have to look at the excessiveness of the budget. I would also expect to look at the size of the council tax increase.

'But it may well be appropriate to consider other matters such as how acceptable the rise in council tax is locally. Council tax payers do not want another round of high increases. If their councils think they do, why don't they allow local people to have their say in a local poll?'

Sir Jeremy Beecham (Lab), chairman of the LGA, welcomed the extra money. But he warned differences in local circumstances made it impossible to guarantee council tax increases would stay below the 7% widely believed to be built into last year's calculations by the Treasury.

'This new money may not be enough to prevent above-inflation council tax rises in many areas, but it will certainly help.

'Councils will do their level best to keep council tax rises as low as possible.'

Mr Brown also used his pre-budget report to announce rewards for councils which successfully promote small business creation.

They will share any additional business rate income, with Mr Brown expecting councils to get an extra £150m in 2005, £300m in 2006 and £450m after that.

He confirmed that as a result of the Lyons Review at least 20,000 civil service jobs will be relocated out of London and the south-east.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.