Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Lambeth LBC has come under damning fire from a judge for its 'disturbing failure' to meet the housing needs of a wo...
Lambeth LBC has come under damning fire from a judge for its 'disturbing failure' to meet the housing needs of a woman with a history of depression and psychiatric difficulties, and her daughter.

Deputy high court judge Sir Christopher Bellamy has ruled that the council allocated its housing contrary to its own housing allocation policy and that this was in breach of the housing legislation.

He held that the change of priority to promote allocation of houses to the homeless at the expense of other groups, such as the mother and daughter in this case here who had been referred by social services, was a major deviation from its policy published in July 2000.

The judge said that the woman, who cannot be named, had been living with her daughter, who is 13 this month, in a single room at a council's hostel since January 1998.

They were originally housed there on a temporary basis, following the woman's application for assistance as a homeless person. She has a back injury which has prevented her from working since 1995, and also has a history of depression and psychiatric difficulties which, the judge said, appeared to be partly caused by her housing situation.

The judge said that the woman claimed she had, at one point, suffered a nervous breakdown and taken an overdose of pills, and made a request that her daughter be taken into care. The social services, in response, categorised the mother as qualifying for the Group F referral class for housing allocation.

She claimed that the council had prioritised Group E homeless people

disproportionately, in conflict with its own allocation policy adopted in July 2000.

Upholding that claim today, the judge said: 'The evidence reveals a

disturbing failure on the part of the council's services, particularly by the housing department, over the past three years at least, to respond to the needs of this family as identified by the social services department.

'The change in priority, which is in effect, the promotion of group E (homeless) at the expense of the other groups, seems to me to be a major deviation from the policy as published in July 2000.

'Section 167(8) of the 1996 Housing Act requires a local housing authority not to allocate housing except in accordance with their allocation scheme. In this case 'the allocation scheme' is that published in July 2000.

'To the extent that, since September 2000, the council has allocated housing not in accordance with the order of priority in the policy published in July 2000, it seems to me that it must follow that it has acted in breach of section 167(8) of the Act and, in consequence, unlawfully.'


L v LB Lambeth - 5 November - Jonathan Manning instructed by Ziadies for L - Jane Oldham instructed by Sternberg Reed Taylor & Gill for LB Lambeth


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.