The scheme, which will reward local authorities for encouraging business in their area, will allow councils to retain money from business rates where there is increased economic growth in their area. It should start in April 2005.
'This scheme should give councils a real incentive to work together with business to create enterprising and thriving communities. We want to create a win-win situation where flourishing businesses will benefit everyone in the community.'
The chancellor said:
'For the first time, all of us in partnership can each secure financial benefits from creating new businesses. Based on historical data, we estimate that, as a result of this measure, local authorities could gain up to £1bn over the next three years ??? showing that the next stage of our employment and growth strategy for Britain can only succeed with greater initiative and engagement by local areas. Further reforms in the Pre-Budget Report will reflect this.'
Responses to the Consultation Paperare invited by the end of October.
An executive summary of the proposals is available here.
The government and the LGA propose to host a joint seminar on the scheme before the end of the consultation period. Further details of this will follow in due course.
1. The Business Growth Incentives scheme was first announced by the chancellor in the Pre-Budget Report in November 2002.
2. The necessary powers to introduce the scheme are contained in Clause 71 of the Local Government Bill currently going through parliament.
Speech by chancellor Gordon Brown to the Local Government Association conference in Harrogate today.
CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
It is a pleasure for me to join John Prescott in addressing the leaders of our cities, towns and communities across England and Wales; to thank everyone here not just for the work you undertake, the service you give, the good you do and the difference you make, but for your central irreplaceable role in driving forward public service improvements and in bringing to life in our time and in our generation the ethos of public service that builds strong communities in our country.
I want to say today that this partnership between central and local government - which is not a partnership of convenience but, because of the beliefs we share in common, a partnership of principle; this partnership founded on the million acts of service by dedicated public servants; this partnership driven forward today by great challenges that face our country which we can only meet if we face them together.
This partnership that acknowledges not only that whenever we walk down the street, collect our kids from school, turn to the emergency services, or look for help for the weak and the frail we depend upon locally provided services but that service delivery for families and communities cannot come from central command and control but requires local initiative and accountability; this partnership is a partnership that I want to see strengthened in a new era of local and national cooperation not just in the social improvement of our country but in the economic development of our communities in the years to come.
So I want to talk today about how the partnership we are achieving in social reform ??? £57 billion more invested in public services, devolution and flexibility in delivery, the greatest possible focus on choice so that the focus is always on the pupil, the patient, the consumer, the citizen - can be complemented by a partnership for economic prosperity: tha t builds better infrastructure, that develops new skills, that rewards innovation and moves each region and locality towards full employment in our country.
To build, in the last six years, a better long-term and strategic partnership between central and local government --- moving away from the destructive centralism of the 1980s and early 1990s, years characterised by universal capping, strict limits on borrowing and the poll tax ---- and to deliver improved public services, the Government ??? led by John Prescott - has already:
Boosted financial support for councils, through real terms increases in revenue and in capital expenditure for four years in a row;
Matched devolution with greater accountability and with new constitutions for local government following local consultation;
Increased the freedoms and flexibilities that local authorities have to deliver ??? including a 75 per cent cut in the number of plans required; reduced ring-fencing; more targeted inspection; a fairer prudential regime for borrowing; and greater freedom to trade;
And introduced local Public Service Agreements which link resources and greater flexibilities to stretching outcome targets for both national and local priorities ??? and next year we will launch a second round of local PSAs that will encourage partnership working and local innovation still further, as we take forward the current review on balance of funding.
To enable us to make inspection regimes more proportionate, target support where it is most needed, and identify the small minority of failing Councils in need of tough remedial action, clear and concise information about each Council's performance across a range of local services is being provided for the first time through the new Comprehensive Performance Assessment.
And to encourage all councils to deliver the best public services, high performing Local Authorities will receive substantial extra freedoms and flexibilities including the removal of both revenue and capital ring f encing; sixty plans reduced to just two required - the Best Value Performance Plan and a Community Plan; a three year holiday from inspection; and the withdrawal of reserve powers over capping, as a first step towards dispensing with the power to cap altogether.
Alongside these incentives, the new Innovation Forum ??? a genuine partnership between local and central government ??? is looking constructively at how Local Authorities can be empowered to provide more locally tailored and high quality services in health, for the elderly, in education and in community safety. Utilising the expertise and experience of the best Local Authorities to help all Councils do better.
This is our vision of a modern partnership between central and local government to deliver both national ambitions and meet local needs - a new localism where there is flexibility and resources in return for reform and delivery. Local Authorities at the heart of public services, equipped with the freedom they need, and accountable to the communities whose needs they serve.
So let me now set out how ??? building on the new freedoms and flexibilities we have put in place, local and national government working together ?????? we can meet our goals of full employment and a prosperous, enterprising economy in every region of our country.
For just as we have learned in these last six years that the social goals - educational opportunity, health reform, public sector improvements, child poverty, helping pensioners - we share cannot be realised in practice without central government devolving power to local communities ??? and whatever challenges we face from time to time, we must remember that we must always work in partnership - so too our goals of full employment and prosperity for all will not be realised without cooperating together and backing local initiative, local solutions, local needs met by local people in local communities.
And let me just explain how it is because in an increasingly globalised economy a full employment Britain that offers prosperity to all depends on regions and localities able to adapt continuously and quickly to change that there is not just a social and political case but an economic case for each local authority's involvement - each Councillor's direct involvement - in the economic development and renewal of our communities and country.
Globalisation describes a world whose very mobility of capital and openness to competition is ushering in a restructuring of industry and services across continents. And while others compete on low value added, low investment and low skilled work, a country like ours has to compete on ever higher levels of skill and technology.
And I tell you that in the new more open global economy levels of local skills and local innovation will matter as much as levels of national demand, otherwise we will have to compete on ever lower levels of poverty pay.
It is because production need no longer be based where the raw materials or ports are and producers can choose wherethey wish to locate that the local and regional economies that are the most successful will be the magnets for inward investment, will retain their skilled people, will attract more to join them.
What will separate off the successful high employment, high growth economies from the least successful is the ability to adapt on the ground, continuously and quickly to fast moving technological change, skills needs and demand changes.
Indeed the paradox of globalisation is that it puts more emphasis on the local.
The more we are interdependent, and thus the more our regions face intense global competition, the more successful will be the regions and localities that have the flexibility to adapt to change.
Meeting the challenges of globalisation depends on securing success in meeting the challenges of localisation.
And the whole of the UK suffers, and balanced economic growth becomes impossible, if we have unemployment, emigration and the under- utilisation of potential and resources in the poorer areas and yet congestion, overcrowding and inflationary pressures in the richer.
That is why we seek a British economy:
Not just founded on monetary and fiscal stability - for in an open economy investment will flow to the stable economies and quickly away from the unstable ones
But built on high levels of innovation skills and adaptability, one driven forward by rapid responses to change ??? with a new adaptability and flexibility
where the local and the regional voice is not only respected but seen as critical to economic success.
The old idea in regional and local economic policy was of help directed from the centre.
The first generation of regional policy, before the war, was essentially ambulance work getting help to high unemployment areas - central government providing first aid.
The second generation in the 1960s and 1970s was based on large capital and tax incentives delivered by the then department of industry and then overseen by Brussels.
Both were inflexible and both were top-down. And both approaches did not do enough to close the gap between the areas of high unemployment and areas of low unemployment.
So the third and new generation of regional economic policy measures seek to strengthen the indigenous sources of growth - local enterprise, local innovation, local infrastructure, local skills and the local labour market ??? tackle disparities between regions and within them.
And the way forward for each region is local people making more decisions locally about meeting local economic needs.
So I want to put forward a set of proposals today that tackle these disparities and close these gaps so that we move forward together to full employment and higher levels of prosperity in each of our localities ??? and because the unemployment rate in some local authorities is five per cent higher than in others, we know that we have further to go.
The new drivers of prosperity in a modern ec onomy are: enterprise, innovation, skills, investment and employment.
So in each area we ask ourselves: What more can we do? How we can learn from local government in areas where you are pioneering new approaches as we build a new partnership between central and local government?
Not the old relationship based on patronage or a blame culture. But a genuine partnership. We know the gaps to be filled. Let me give you examples:
First, enterprise. Small business creation rates are more than ten times lower in some Local authority areas than others.
And in Barrow-in-Furness and Wansbeck for example, there are six times fewer businesses per 10,000 population than in some London authorities like Camden and Islington.
But I believe that the gap between Local Authorities is such that we should see this not as a signal for despondency, but a challenge and indeed an opportunity for improvement.
The old idea was that you got full employment from a small number of large companies.
Today, as the paper we are publishing today on the role of Local Authorities in economic development shows, full employment needs a large number of small companies creating jobs.
For every three small businesses creating jobs in the best off areas, there is just one, creating far fewer jobs, in the poorest areas ??? and as every Councillor knows, fewer businesses means fewer jobs which means reduced income for services and yet more social problems that public services need to fund.
So one of the best pro-jobs, anti-poverty programmes is to help more people start more small businesses, and ensure that access to capital, advice, skills - once restricted only to an elite - is opened up to men and women in every part of Britain.
Some Local Authorities are already striving to achieve these aims. Councils like Bexley, Eastleigh, Knowsley and Rotherham that have gained beacon status for fostering business growth have seen a real improvement in the numbers of busine sses and jobs being created in their area. Our challenge is to put in place the right environment to enable all localities to achieve these successes.
In the past, with the rigidity of the uniform business rate, Local Authorities gained no direct financial incentive from giving priority to business creation. In fact Local Authorities could justifiably argue that they had to deal with the social and environmental cost of economic development ??? in transport congestion, environmental damage and pressure on services like housing and education ??? but that the financial gains through increased income tax and business rates were passed back to central government.
So to tackle this, the current Local Government Bill will allow Local Authorities to keep a share of the business rate receipts that result from new business creation --- creating positive financial incentives for Local Authorities and the wider local community to maximise local economic activity while at the same time avoiding excessive bureaucracy and ensuring fairness between localities.
Today we are publishing the consultation paper on the details of the scheme. This shows that if our preferred model had been introduced in 2000 then Harrogate District Council would by this year have received an additional £875,000 to spend on local priorities as dictated by local people, Sandwell an additional £5.7 million, Peterborough £7 million more and Stockport an extra £10.5 million.
Based on historical data we estimate that in total as a result of this measure, local authorities could gain up to £1 billion over the next three years -- showing that the next stage of our employment and growth strategy for Britain can only succeed with greater initiative and engagement by local areas in improving business creation, job opportunities, skills and innovation. Further reforms in the Pre Budget Report will reflect this.
So for the first time all of us in partnership can each secure financial benefits f rom creating new businesses.
And by introducing incentives for every local authority to encourage business creation, we not only put in place the right conditions for job creation but also release more resources for investment in public services.
This measure to give local authorities more resources goes hand in hand with our extra help for areas of greatest deprivation - the emphasis of our approach increasingly on policies to encourage and foster the indigenous skills, talents and potential of local people and communities.
I want people in disadvantaged communities to see that the enterprise culture too often restricted to the elite is open to them - not least in high unemployment communities where prosperity for too long has passed people by.
So we have designated the 2000 most disadvantaged areas in the UK as Enterprise Areas where - working in partnership with Local Authorities and RDAs - we encourage economic activity by cutting the cost of starting up, investing, employing, training and managing the payroll. Here we are bringing together industry, planning, employment and social security policies to tackle local property market, capital market and labour market failures -- hence the new community investment tax relief, the power to relax planning regulations, the abolition of stamp duty, the engagement of the new deal ??? central and local government working together to bring investment, jobs and prosperity to areas that prosperity has still bypassed.
Today we are publishing a paper that shows why we see local authorities as strategic leaders of local economic development and sets out further details on the help available in enterprise areas. I urge local authorities to use the opportunities presented by these measures to support and strengthen their own local economic and regeneration strategies, and boost the awareness and uptake of incentives by local businesses.
Renewing the local economic base is also one of the main aims behind not only neighbourhood ren ewal funding in 88 areas worth almost £1.9 billion pounds over this parliament and the new deal for communities in 39 areas worth £2 billion pounds over ten years; but the creation of local strategic partnerships which can do more to drive forward policies on enterprise and employment at the local level.
Second, look at innovation. In some areas we spend one tenth - £50 per person ??? on research and development what we do in others - £500 per person.
While these figures are for regions, they show the gap to be filled. And we know that every successful region and locality must encourage its scientists, its inventors and its innovators - and improve links between its schools, colleges, universities and businesses.
Our regional and local approach means we are already moving from centrally administered r and d policies to the encouragement of local technology transfer between universities and companies and the development of regional clusters of specialisms ??? encouraging the growth of the knowledge-based company and the business friendly university.
But we can do more to develop new local science and industry partnerships like the north west science council and the Technium schemes in Wales --- strengthening links between businesses, universities, regional development agencies and local authorities to support the development of hi-tech industry clusters. And we have asked Richard Lambert, former editor of the Financial Times, to examine how business-university interaction at the local level can contribute to productivity growth.
back to top
Third, investment. To release new investment I know you want us to remove barriers in the planning system so that together we can better promote local economic development.
At the moment, there is an unacceptably wide variation in the performance of planning authorities. Over 70 councils are already meeting our target of processing 60 per cent of major planning ap plications in 13 weeks, but a similar number cannot manage to process 30 per cent of such applications in time.
That is why the government has allocated an extra £170 million to reward faster responses to planning applications -- and we will use best value intervention powers to bring change where improvements do not come fast enough.
At the same time we are simplifying the planning guidance we issue to local authorities and the new 'Planning Policy Statement 4' on planning for economic development will be issued for consultation later this year.
Alongside our investment of nearly 2.8 billion pounds more in real terms in housing by 2006 and 6.4 billion a year more in transport, we have also made it possible to ensure that what we spend and how we spend on infrastructure improvements is increasingly decided regionally and locally.
With the vast majority of the housing capital budget now devolved, we are moving towards pooling housing spend in regional 'pots', and have created new regional housing boards - bringing together RDAs, local authorities, housing corporations and other relevant bodies to draw up regional housing strategies and make recommendations on funding allocations. Progressively a greater proportion of funding will be allocated by these boards on the basis of the case local authorities make for local needs rather than on arbitrary formulae handed down by Whitehall. And the Deputy Prime Minister's reforms will allow local authorities to mix and match financing and management mechanisms for turning round their housing stock rather than the one size fits all approach.
We are also enabling local people to make local decisions about local needs in transport ----- matching local authority control over nearly a third of transport spending - and new powers to raise funds through congestion charging - with a responsibility on councils to produce comprehensive and costed five year transport plans.
So as we move from centrally run housing and transport policies to greater local coordination and flexibility, this major decentralisation is transforming relationships between the centre and localities.
I come now to skills. Look at the gap between the areas with the most skills and the areas with the least skills. In some local authorities, nearly 100 per cent of 16 year olds are participating in education or training. In others ??? Salford, Milton Keynes, Harrow ??? it is less than 70 per cent. Some local authority areas in our country have nearly 65 per cent of 16 year olds with 5 a*-c GCSEs others have less than 30 per cent. Overall across the economy 7 million adults lack basic qualifications. But when some do better we know that all can do better.
The challenge, because we waste too much of the talent of Britain, is to open up opportunities for education to an extent never before seen in this country so that every child, young person and adult will have the best possible chances in life.
And we know we have to look not just at schools but at post-school education. So we are extending the employer training pilots now operating in six areas to around a quarter of the country -- offering incentives for firms to give their staff paid time off to train towards basic skills and NVQ level 2. And a major shake-up in skills training will be announced next week. Building on the new frameworks for regional employment and skills action ??? in which local authorities are key partners alongside RDAs, the private sector and local learning and skills councils - we are piloting devolved pooled budgets for adult learning in four areas of the country -- providing greater incentives to employers and individuals to develop their skills, reducing bureaucracy and strengthening the regional and local dimension in skills development.
And looking to the workforce of the future, we are expanding the modern apprenticeship scheme.
Already, apprenticeships, which a few years ago were dying, have risen in number to 220,000 today. And our ai m is that over a quarter of young people aged between 16 and 22 will take part in the scheme by 2004, with even more benefiting by the end of the decade.
Giving every young person who works hard and tries hard the chance of an apprenticeship or college or university.
Finally, employment. While some areas of Britain are now full employment areas ??? where in some council areas unemployment is below 1 per cent - some areas have 6 per cent claimant count unemployment and over 40 per cent of the working age population not in work.
In every area of this country, you as councillors will know at first hand young people who have never worked, long term unemployed men and women who have given up hope, school leavers with no qualifications - no jobs, no cash, no hope - many of whom are now enjoying opportunities for the first time in their lives because of the new deal.
This New Deal initiative has been taken forward by central and local government working together.
And thanks to the efforts of many of you here, 870,000 people have got work through the New Deal so far.
But as long as there is unemployment we will not be complacent - and as local councillors I would like you to play an ever bigger role in the next steps to help the newly redundant get back to work quickly and expand the New Deal to assist those hardest to employ.
We need to make the New Deal more effective and we want to work with you to overcome the barriers to local employment opportunity in your council area and in your region.
Today we find that there are almost 600,000 vacancies in the economy. That there are large numbers of vacancies in each region ??? almost as many as 2 years ago, and 1 year ago despite the world downturn jobs for people prepared to take them. The North East which used to have few vacancies today has over 10,000.
And there are not just vacancies in the South East, but in every region
In Wales nearly 15,000
In the West Midlands 24,000
In Scotland over 25,000
In the North West nearly 30,000
And so the next stage of the New Deal is to do more to link jobs without workers to workers without jobs. So in addition to requiring the long term unemployed in 40 areas of the UK to take jobs on offer,
Job centres will have local budgets to help with travel, training and equipment to ensure the unemployed can get back to work quickly
There will be a new ethnic minorities fund and area-based initiatives to tackle the particular barriers facing those who too often miss out on jobs
And we want to follow the innovative examples of councils like Bristol and Brighton who have tailored supplementary employment programmes to complement the New Deal
For too long too many single parents have been denied work. So in addition to the minimum wage and our new tax credits ??? raising the in-work income for a lone parent with two children who works full time to £276 a week even after tax - we will pilot an extra £20 a week for those lone parents who voluntarily undertake job search, rising to £40 extra a week for their first year in work.
And with new housing benefit help ??? delivered in partnership by local authorities - lone parents on a typical rent of £50 a week and working part time will receive at least £213 a week making them far better off working part time than not working at all.
For too long too many young people have fallen through the net. Some of the hardest to help are young offenders ? 70 per cent of whom re-offend. So the government is now seeing how we can apply nationwide ? under the leadership of Sir John Parker of Transco ? the successful reading training for work programme ? offering young offenders training and work while in prison with, on good behaviour, a job when they are released: a programme with a 78 per cent success rate so far.
For too long too many disabled people have desperately wanted jobs but have lacked the support they needed to move into work.
As a first step for men and women on incapacity benefit who wish to work, there is now an extra £19 a week as the guaranteed minimum income for 35 hours work rises to £194. We are looking at how improved rehabilitation, capability assessment and training support can help disabled people and those who have suffered ill health fulfil their potential in work. And in the local authority areas where our new pathways to work initiative is being piloted, we want local councils to play a full part - as both service providers and employers - in helping shift the focus on disability from what people cannot do to what they can.
For too long in too many deprived areas of the country there has been a destructive culture that 'no-one around here works'.
So we will provide far more help than in the past in these areas, using the sanctions and opportunities available in the New Deal and where necessary taking job advisers onto estates -- offering the unemployed training, advice and sometimes cash support to help them get into work, and linking them to jobs in the vicinity, but in return expecting the unemployed to take up the jobs that are available.
Tackling the worst concentrations of unemployment, street by street, estate by estate.
So one by one: enterprise, innovation, investment, skills, employment - we break down the barriers to prosperity with local and central government working closely together.
In other words, a new partnership - with government enabling and empowering rather than directing and controlling and with local authorities building capacity and focusing on improving the prosperity of their localities.
Instead of people looking to Whitehall for solutions in locality after locality, more and more people are themselves taking more control of the decisions that most affect them ??? a devolution of power that is now ready to spread across regions, local government and communities, large and small.
And as we look to the future, we w ill strengthen and deepen our dialogue with you to identify those areas where further reform will help you most. And we will involve you too in our decision on the euro. The deputy prime minister and I recently issued guidance to local authorities on euro preparations and you now have the opportunity to consult your local communities and develop your own changeover plans.
I agree with Sir Jeremy Beecham that this new localism ??? effective devolution based upon a genuine partnership between central and local government - moves us forward from an old Britain weakened by centuries of centralisation towards a new Britain strengthened by local centres of initiative, energy and dynamism.
And in this way, I believe that a new era - an age of active citizenship and an enabling state - is now within our grasp ---- at its core, a renewal of civic society where the rights to decent services and the responsibilities of citizenship go hand in hand.
But I end where I began. We all know about what brings people into public services - the belief that we can make a difference.
And we know that if ??? building on the expertise and success that some of the best councils have demonstrated - we can empower local managers and local service deliverers, that ethos of public service - the importance public servants attach to duty, obligation, care and compassion ??? can, working within the right framework, ensure the best public services in the world.
And as we look now to the future, let us remember not just the challenges ahead but the inspiration that comes from the achievements of the pioneers of local government and civic pride -- leaders whose hopes, whose vision, whose ideals inspired a whole generation to greater public service. Men and women prepared to modernise, to reform, to change, to tear up old ideas and adopt new ones.
They developed a shared vision that remains our vision today: a vision of a just society in which everyone - and not just a few - had a chance to fu lfil their potential, in which even in times of hardship people strove to help each other. A shared vision of a society in which by the strong helping the weak, it made us all stronger.
Never let us lose that ambition for our country and for the communities which we serve. We must never lose the ambition that we can scale new heights, meet new needs, tackle deep-rooted injustices, and work together for a better, stronger society.
That shared ambition that social justice and economic progress can go hand in hand, and that in our Britain everyone has a part to play.
That is the vision I put before you today.
That is our aim. That is now our task. That, if we work together, will be our achievement.'
Address by The Deputy Prime Minister to the LGA Annual Conference in Harrogate
Friday 4 July 2003
[Check against delivery]
'Thank you Jeremy. I am pleased to be back again at the LGA Conference and back in Harrogate. This is the fourth time I have addressed your conference as Secretary of State for local government.
Thank you also Gordon, not just for attending today, but for the support you have given local government over the last 6 years.
Since 1997 you have increased local authority funding from £36 billion to £51 billion a year. That is a 25% real terms increase compared with a 7% real terms decrease from 1993 to 1997.
That is generous in any terms. But I recognise it is never enough.
Gordon and I attended your conference in July 1997 ??? just 10 weeks into the first Labour term in office.
At that conference we promised:
The capital receipts initiative ??? we delivered;
Regional Development Agencies ??? we delivered;
Elected government for London ??? we delivered;
New rules for public private partnerships ??? we delivered;
Best Value instead of Comp ulsory Competitive Tendering ??? we delivered;
And we promised to tackle the scourge of non-decent homes ??? and we've delivered with 700,000 homes brought up to scratch since 1997.
Stephen Byers ??? when he was Secretary of State ??? continued the reform programme with his White Paper on Comprehensive Performance Assessment and freedoms and flexibilities.
And last year, after a 12 month sabbatical in the Cabinet Office, I was delighted to take back the local government brief with the establishment of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Since then, we have made rapid progress.
We have introduced a comprehensive package of freedoms and flexibilities.
We have launched the successful first phase of the Comprehensive Performance Assessment process.
I hear the Leader of the Opposition has now promised to abolish CPA. I think that must be because of the rumour in Whitehall that we were going to extend CPA to cover the Opposition ??? Iain, it's only a rumour!
We have given local authorities greater freedom over capital spending and new powers to trade.
We have launched a £22 billion programme to create sustainable communities ??? communities not just homes and housing estates.
Our sustainable communities plan will tackle high demand in some parts of the country and low demand in others.
We have increased funding for affordable housing and regeneration.
We have championed new ways of working, new forms of finance and new mechanisms to deliver more social and affordable homes.
We have put an extra £350 million into the reform of the planning system and have emphasised the importance of good design in creating sustainable communities.
We have given the go-ahead for referendums on regional government in three regions.
And last week I published a White Paper on the Modernisation of the Fire and Rescue Service in England and Wales.
The list goes on. We have a radical reforming agenda. We are putting it in place step b y step. Working with you. In partnership with you.
I note the Opposition have pledged to reverse a number of these changes. We have to wait and see what the alternative is.
For example, if they replace Best Value, will we go back to CCT?
In all this I am fortunate to be supported by the most competent and hard working Minister of State that any Cabinet Minister could wish for. You all know and respect Nick Raynsford. My Minister for Local Government and a good friend of local government.
I just want to take this opportunity to record my thanks to him for all his hard work ??? and also to welcome Phil Hope to the local government team.
If there is one theme I want to emphasise today it is the importance of working together.
Improving local services in order to enhance the quality of life for local people must be done in partnership.
I said that last year. I believed it then. I believe it now.
We may have our ups and downs. We may have our political differences. But our guiding principle must be one of partnership ??? not master and servant ??? but partners.
That is why I established the Central Local Partnership. The first meeting of the CLP took place a week before your conference in 1997. Since then we have held three meetings a year and I am grateful to you Jeremy and to Sandy Bruce Lockhart, Chris Clarke and the LGA team for the positive role you have played.
A sign of a strong institution is its ability to work well together not just when things go smoothly ??? but also when they do not.
Take the latest local difficulty ??? schools funding. You can't get more local or more difficult than that.
I won't go over the ins and outs, but this year has been difficult.
The government accepts that schools did face real problems this year. Some because of falling rolls. Others because of the way in which funding was distributed. More in some parts of the country than in others.
But let's not forget that there has been a record increase in education funding since 1997.
We have increased the number of teachers by 25,000.
We have increased the number of support staff by 80,000.
That puts the small number of teacher redundancies this year into its proper context.
We have completed 20,000 school repair or refurbishment projects.
Pay for good, experienced teachers is up 22% in real terms. And on average is up by more than 11%. That was not an accident. It was a deliberate policy decision. More teachers and better teachers mean higher standards ??? record results in primary schools, GCSEs, and A Levels. And an excellent partnership of Government and LEAs.
So I believe by working in partnership we can overcome this year's difficulties. We all want to see fair treatment for schools and their pupils.
We all want to see schools getting the best possible deal throughout the country.
Parents want it.
Children need it.
It's up to us to deliver it.
That is our responsibility and we need to work together to carry it out and avoid the controversy we saw this year.
That is clearly the strong view of the Prime Minister.
Freedom and Delivery
Chair, last November I set out a package of measures to give local authorities greater freedom and flexibility. I suspect that package went further than many of you expected.
It is taking some time to deliver ??? but we are removing decades of accumulated control ??? much of it statutory and more than our fair share of outdated old fashioned practices.
But we have already abolished 84 separate consent requirements.
And the Chancellor has today re-stated our faith in local authorities and emphasised the importance of local authorities in promoting local economic activity.
We have legislated for the power of 'well being'.
We are consulting on local authority business growth incentives.
And the Local Government Bill will give you new freedoms to borrow, trade and charge for discretionary services.
We are also removing plan requirements, reducing inspections, rationalising area based initiatives and reducing ring fencing.
I intend to devote more energy to this bureaucracy busting.
That's why I have asked Phil Hope to take the lead in reducing the regulatory burden and allow you to get on with what you do best ??? serving your local communities.
But hand in hand with these freedoms and flexibilities come responsibilities.
That is what Comprehensive Performance Assessment is all about.
I know that CPA was controversial when it was introduced ??? and that there were concerns at last year's conference.
So, can I thank you all for co-operating and getting it off to a good start in the unitaries and county councils.
More than half of you are 'good' or 'excellent'.
A handful of you are unacceptably poor.
But all of us have the obligation to raise standards. And I have made clear to the Chairman of the Audit Commission that CPA is not a stick to beat you with, but a way of raising standards across the board.
I am fighting your corner in Cabinet. CPA helps me to argue for more resources. It shows my Cabinet colleagues that local authorities are improving and that new freedoms and flexibilities are not being abused.
Freedoms and flexibilities are at the heart of our local government agenda. But there are two sides to the coin. Freedoms on one side, responsibilities on the other. They are inter-dependent.
I am reminded of that when I look at finance. Let me repeat, this year's settlement was the best for a decade ??? and part of a sustained year on year increase.
But look at what happened.
Local government grant went up by 5.9% - well ahead of inflation. But council tax went up by an average 13% and for some councils by more than 40%.
Local government faces real pressures for better schools. Bette r social services. Safer, cleaner streets. And many other things that your communities need.
But people also deserve best value from their local council.
At a time when the government is making record investment in local services, I find it difficult to see the justification for large council tax rises.
I find it even more difficult when some councils limit council tax increases in an election year and impose rises of 20% or 30% the year after.
I have to ask the question ??? how does playing politics with council tax fit in with responsible financial management?
To my mind responsible financial management means managing the budget for the benefit of local people.
I made that clear to one local authority leader this year who justified his 25% council tax increase by saying that we had cut his grant by £11 million. He said that even though we had actually increased his grant by £8 million and even though he had manipulated his budget to cut council tax before the election.
He also went so far as to write to every one of his council tax payers blaming central government and refusing to take personal responsibility for the budget decisions that he had made.
My view is that he made the decisions. He should take the responsibility. Freedoms and responsibilities go hand in hand.
And I might just add that as the Secretary of State who abolished crude and universal capping, I have not given up the option of sophisticated and well targeted capping for authorities who do not manage their budgets properly.
Balance of Funding
Freedoms and responsibilities are also crucial elements in the balance of funding review that we are both working on.
Any changes to the balance of funding between central and local government will require reassurances about the responsible use of public money.
In any public service you can't talk about funding without talking about pay for public servants.
As part of last year's 7. 8% settlement over 2 years for local government employees we agreed to part fund the Local Government Pay Commission which is looking at a fairer pay structure for local authority employees.
While I don't negotiate the wages, I have a responsibility to ensure that pay settlements are fair. Government has a balancing act to perform.
In the fire dispute we had to get the balance right between firefighters and other public sector employees. 40% for firefighters against 4% for other local authority employees just wasn't on.
Equally ??? and I don't expect this to be popular ??? we have to achieve a fair balance between junior employees and our most senior members of staff.
Chief Executive Pay
It is important for all of us in the public sector to retain, recruit and motivate staff. That is true at whatever level.
I recognise that pay is a matter for each individual local authority.
But how can it be right for a local authority chief executive to be paid more than the Prime Minister?
Exceptional circumstances may require exceptional pay in individual cases.
But the justifiable exception can become the unjustified norm. If there is a big award for a chief executive, what is the effect on salaries for other staff? What happens when authorities start to offer bigger and bigger packages to fill senior posts?
We need to think this through before it gets out of hand.
That's as much an issue of fairness as 40% for firefighters.
That brings me to some of the other specific challenges we are facing today.
We want a fair pay structure in the Fire Service but we also want reform. The White Paper I published on Monday this week outlined the reforms I believe are necessary to produce a modern Fire Service which balances local and regional priorities.
I have proposed regional boards for the fire service because I believe it is right.
But you all know my wider commitment to the regiona l agenda.
On 16 June I announced that the North East, the North West and Yorkshire & the Humber could proceed towards referendums.
The choice about whether to go ahead is made by people in each region.
They will also have a choice about what form of unitary local authority structure will exist below any Elected Regional Assembly.
We want to see stronger regions for the same reason we want to see stronger local government. Strong regions can make the most of their indigenous economic strength. Just as strong local authorities can make the most of their own unique qualities.
Regional and local dimensions are essential parts of good government ??? that is true whether or not we have Elected Regional Assemblies.
The challenge is to make decisions at the right level.
We need to devolve power from central to regional government. But we must avoid the mistake of centralising at regional level by taking power from the local government. Strong local government is crucial.
Finally, localism. There has been a lot of talk about localism recently. And your Conference has discussed it this week.
That's healthy. But I know from my experience with the New Deal for Communities programme that giving power to people at the very local level is sometimes resented by local councillors.
The principle, however, stands. We need to devolve power to where it is best exercised.
That applies to central government, the regions and local government.
I know for example that you have debated the issue and that there are strong feelings about local government representation on Foundation Hospital Trusts. I have discussed this with John Reid and Rosie Winterton and I believe the new Secretary of State for Health is considering putting local authority representatives on Foundation Hospital Trust Boards.
To me it is obvious why localism matters. Local people care most about what happens outside their front doors - about whether their c ommunity is safe, attractive and one where people want to live.
People want to have some say about it themselves. They want active involvement, not just a vote at local council elections.
I'm convinced that local authorities can do more to improve their local areas and their contacts with their electorates.
Local authorities do make a difference. They are the essential framework for any form of localism and accountability.
That's a challenging thought.
But working together, I think we can do more.
We have a shared aim ??? to improve the quality of life for people up and down the country.
The benefits of success are huge. For local politics, and for public services.
I commit myself to working with you for change and for a stronger partnership between central and local government.
Let's commit ourselves to working together - national government and local government ??? to achieve them.
I am a champion for local government. I represent your cause within central government and I believe that by working together we can deliver on the government's priorities ??? whether it's education, social services or the local environment.
We are all interested in the quality of life??? whether in central government, local government, or in future regional government.
I believe fundamentally in the role of strong local authorities in our democracy.
I am fully committed with central government to improve the life of local people.
I pledge to work with you to make a difference to the people we serve.'