Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The Local Government Association says it has a 'clear mandate' from councils for its proposal to split the Local Go...
The Local Government Association says it has a 'clear mandate' from councils for its proposal to split the Local Government Management Board and take over much of its work.

Consultation shows nearly 80% of councils agree the LGMB's training and development should go into an arm's length agency, with policy and governance work taken over by the LGA.

On more detailed proposals, the response is less clear. Nearly 48% say employer functions, including pay negotiations, should stay with a training and development agency while 31% say it should be a separate agency overseen by the LGA.

Quality and management work should go to the LGA, say 54%, while 36% of responses say it should stay with training and development.

By the middle of this week 136 responses had been received, including 107 from councils. The deadline was originally two weeks ago, and was extended until today.

The chair of the group leading the review, Greenwich LBC leader Len Duvall, said the board's policy, quality and management work would almost certainly go to the LGA.

Despite responses backing negotiations and training in one agency, Mr Duvall said that was still 'up in the air'. Pay negotiations were very important and 'sometimes the training and development is a bit of a Cinderella and falls off the agenda. It's important to ensure it doesn't'.

Mr Duvall said the review was about better relationships and transparency, and did not show a lack of confidence in the LGMB. Group members were conscious of the effect on staff and wanted to give a clear direction soon.

The review group meets on 15 May to set recommendations for the policy committee.

LGMB chairman Harry Jones also sits on the member group. In its own response, the LGMB argued that only non-employment policy work should go to the LGA, and management, training, negotiations and most of the research should stay together.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.