Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

LOCAL PEOPLE TO GET POWERS TO TACKLE PHONE MASTS UNDER TORIES

  • Comment
The Conservatives would give local people the final say over the location of mobile phone masts, under plans to tac...
The Conservatives would give local people the final say over the location of mobile phone masts, under plans to tackle cheap and poorly designed masts blighting communities across the country.

Representing the biggest changes in planning regulations since the 1984 Telecommunications Act, the Conservatives would ensure all masts require full planning permission, that health concerns are taken into account, and visual intrusion is reduced.

Today's policies come amid warnings that under 3G technology, there could be an estimated 100,000 more masts being sited across the country, in addition to new 'Tetra' and Network Rail masts.

Launching a new Conservative campaign, You decide where they go, shadow local government minister Caroline Spelman said:

'The erection of poorly-located masts is causing considerable disquiet in many parts of the country. There is a presumption in favour of development inherent in the current planning system, which overrides local, environmental and safety concerns.'

Under the new five point plan:

1. All mobile phone mast developments would require full planning permission, so that local councillors are clearly accountable and answerable for where masts are located.

2. There would be a single process for deciding all masts, including those on Network Rail or church property, Tetra masts, as well as small antennas being covertly installed in street furniture or signs.

3. Councils would be allowed to take health concerns into account such as near homes, hospitals and schools. Current national planning guidance prohibits this.

4. Mast operators would be required to demonstrate that any development does not result in unacceptable damage to visual amenity or harm environmentally sensitive features.

5. Councils would be asked to draw up their own supplementary planning guidance to ensure consistency and clarity for operators and residents, and ensure a plan-led approach to future development.

Mrs Spelman added:

'Conservatives will champion the interests of local residents and address the feelings of powerlessness and frustration experienced living under the threat of badly sited masts. Local councillors, answerable to local residents via the ballot box, should have the final say on where they go.

'During the Birmingham Hodge Hill election, Labour pledged in their leaflets that they would 'do everything we can to ensure that there are no more phone masts near schools and hospitals'. Yet the Labour government have failed to support private members bills in parliament or change planning laws to back up those pledges. Ahead of the general election, we will ensure that Labour will pay for their dishonesty - at the ballot box.'

Notes

(1) '3G' masts are those required to support new '3rd generation' mobile phone technology such as video-calling. 'Tetra' masts are part of a new police secure communications system, but have attracted particular controversy because of concerns about the impact of their electro-magnetic radiation on human health.

(2) The policy document launched today is available here.

(3) A high resolution (300 dpi) poster is available at:

http://www.conservatives.com/pdf/mastposter-jpeg.jpg (JPEG)

http://www.conservatives.com/pdf/mastposter-pdf.pdf (PDF)

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.