Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
An effective and efficient capital housing programme cannot be delivered unless action is taken to create a more st...
An effective and efficient capital housing programme cannot be delivered unless action is taken to create a more stable system to encourage long term planning and value for money, the Association of London Government has warned.

In a letter to local government and housing minister Hilary Armstrong, sent on behalf of all three major parties, ALG housing chair Pete Challis said that the recent HIP allocations for 1998/99 would be disastrous for some councils and highlighted the weaknesses of the current system.

He voiced three major concerns: the total amount of resources allocated to London, the indicators of need used to decide how much each council gets, and the way the discretion element of the distribution process is used.

'We know that the government is committed to maintaining existing public spending levels, but you will understand the disappointment felt by authorities that the planned housing programme was reduced by a further£70m and that these reductions fell almost entirely on the local authority elements,' Cllr Challis said in the letter.

He said there was particular disappointment that the government had chosen to fully implement the previous government's widely-opposed changes to the factors used to measure housing need, including the removal of all measurement of homelessness and temporary accommodation usage.

'It would have been possible to either reinstate these measurements, or at the very least extend the damping arrangements in order to limit the damage done to certain individual authorities. We are extremely concerned that no such arrangements have been made and that the consequences for some authorities are disastrous.

'Efficient and effective capital programmes cannot be delivered within a framework of almost continual turbulence and massive year on year variations. It is essential that more stable systems are developed which encourage long term planning and value for money from housing investment.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.