Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Metropolitan councils are proposing a major overhaul of the system for compensating councils which lose out from ch...
Metropolitan councils are proposing a major overhaul of the system for compensating councils which lose out from changes to the grant distribution system.

The changes, which are being considered by the DoE, are likely to be opposed by district and county councils.

The Association of Metropolitan Authorities says the current method, which aims to cushion council tax payers against losses of grant, is unfair.

It points out that it works against deprived urban areas which are more dependent on grant. The structure of the grant system means that in an authority which is dependent on central funds, a withdraw of grant leads to a disproportionately greater increase in council tax.

In the worst hit authority, Tower Hamlets LBC, a 2% loss of grant, the current trigger point for reduction grant payments, leads to a 19.8% increase in band D council tax bills.

At the other end of the spectrum, in Wokingham DC, the same 2% reduction only leads to a 4.2% increase in tax.

The AMA argues that the compensation scheme should be changed to give more relief to authorities where the impact of grant reductions has the greatest effect on council tax payers.

'We are seeking a level playing field, council tax payers in deprived met areas should be given the same degree of protection from potential standard spending assessment losses,' said AMA policy officer Phil Walker.

The association is also proposing a change to the way reduction grant is paid in shire areas.

At the moment grant is paid at both the county and district council level whereas in unitary authorities payments are limited to the impact across the board.

This means that a metropolitan authority only gains compensation if changes in the grant payments across its services lead to a net loss.

In shire areas the council tax payer would receive compensation at a district level for a loss of funding irrespective of a gain in grant at the county level.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.