Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NO DUTY ON COUNCIL TO PROVIDE ACCOMMODATION SOUGHT

  • Comment
A schizophrenic father of eight has failed in his bid for a high court ruling that his local housing authority is u...
A schizophrenic father of eight has failed in his bid for a high court ruling that his local housing authority is under an absolute duty to provide larger accommodation for him, his wife and their children under the provisions of the National Assistance Act 1948.

The court move was taken against Tower Hamlets LBC by the man, who has not worked since 1981 and whose whole family are wholly dependent on social security benefits live in a small two bedroom flat on the ground floor of a council-owned block.

The family are on the council's waiting list for a transfer to a larger property but because of the size of property required the council is unable to specify when such a property will be available.

A report on the community care needs of the family was carried out which indicated that over-crowding was the family's main problem. An assessment by a community mental health nurse also indicated that the best way of ensuring maintenance of the mental stability of the man at the centre of the case was by his transfer to more suitable accommodation.

It was in those circumstances that an application was made to the court for a ruling that the council was under an absolute duty to provide accommodation under section 21 of the 1948 Act. The section provides authorisation for councils to provide residential accommodation for those over 18 who by reason of age, illness disability or other circumstances are in need of care an attention which is not otherwise available to them.

In this case it was argued that the man had a need for accommodation because of his schizophrenia. However, the council argued that although he needed accommodation, he was receiving appropriate care and attention and, therefore, as care and attention was 'otherwise available' it was under no absolute duty to re-house.

Backing the council and dismissing the application Mr Justice Stanley Burnton said it had been established that the applicant needed housing accommodation by reasons of illness but he accepted the council's assessment that he was not in need of care and attention that was not otherwise available.

He said the assessment of the community mental nursing officer was not relevant as he was not an employee or officer of the authority. In the circumstances there was no duty on the council to provide the accommodation sought.

R (on the application of Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council - before Stanley Burnton J - 23 August 2001 - James Goudie QC and Zia Nabi (instructed by Miles & Partners) appeared for the applicant; Stephen Knafler (instructed by Akin Alabi) appeared for the respondent.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.