Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NORTH EAST'S PICUTRE OF MALE-DOMINATED COUNCILS 'IS REPLICATED ELSEWHERE'

  • Comment
The north east is failing to bolster the numbers of women active on the political scene - and evidence points to si...
The north east is failing to bolster the numbers of women active on the political scene - and evidence points to similar problems elsewhere, reports The Guardian (p17).

The article follows a joint study carried out by the Universities of Durham and Northumbria, which found few women hold key management positions at councils in the region.

Public bodies are run by middle-aged men, who are unrepresentative of the population profile of the region, according to the study, entitled 'Who Runs the North-east Now?'.

Fred Robinson, of Durham University, said: 'Democracy is at a low ebb in the north-east.'

The two universities tracked down every member of the local councils, the police authorities, NHS trusts, housing associations, and arts funders.

The study also found few members of ethnic minorities and the disabled represented at a senior level.

The Guardian says the report looked at only one region but its findings are certain to be repeated elsewhere; Yorkshire is about to commission a study of its own and the north west is expected to follow suit.

The nub is that to make a difference, an elected regional assembly, for example, would have to engage public interest and enthusiasm. And yet 'government in the north east largely denies or prevents real participation by 'ordinary people''.

Government in the English regions should be classic ground for reformers, even popular movements (the government is going to require a referendum before it allows full regionalisation). Except that, on this evidence, there aren't two sides in the democratic debate.

The very people who currently 'deny and prevent' are the ones who in the new dawn would be required to be 'engaging and enthusing', it says.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.