Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A former senior Audit Commission officer has delivered a stinging critique of education watchdog Ofsted's inspectio...
A former senior Audit Commission officer has delivered a stinging critique of education watchdog Ofsted's inspection of local education authorities in evidence to the Commons education select committee.

In written evidence presented this week, Greg Wilkinson said he spoke as 'a critical friend in the hope that it will make a valuable organisation even better'.

But Mr Wilkinson, who resigned as the Audit Commission's associate director of local government studies last July, challenges Ofsted's methodology, efficiency neutrality and accountability.

Questioning why an inspection aimed at judging the performance of an LEA spends more than half its time in individual schools, Mr Wilkinson says this leaves inspectors open to allegations that such visits 'are little more than fishing expeditions in which inspectors pick up gossip about the LEA'.

He says the basis for comparing educational attainment varies from inspection to inspection, again leaving room for critics to attack Ofsted's motivation.

'Key conclusions in inspection reports are often supported by a weak evidence base. For example, critical judgments on LEAs' overall performance have been formed on the basis of views expressed by heads or teachers at one or two schools,' he says.

Mr Wilkinson, who works as a consultant and is the councillor with prime responsibility for education at Hammersmith and Fulham LBC, also criticises Ofsted for not giving LEAs adequate time to influence inspection reports, which contain bland, unhelpful recommendations and which are written in 'an essayistic and on occasions journalistic style'.

'Particularly in the commentaries, the writers expend considerable effort on crafting certain criticisms in a lively or colourful style, rather than on the clear exposition of problems and solutions. Some of these literary flourishes create antagonism between the inspectors and the LEA and impede discussion of the substantive issues,' he says.

Unlike the Audit Commission and other inspectorates Ofsted is not accountable to any board, he says. This means LEAs 'have reason to question its methods, behaviour, objectivity and fairness'.

The Local Government Association told the inquiry an advisory panel should be set up to have a say in the appointment of the Ofsted chief inspector.

But LGA education director Neil Fletcher said: 'What's important is whether an authority or a school is doing a good job or not.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.