Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

OFT SHUTS DOOR ON UNFAIR TRADING PRACTICES

  • Comment
A door supplier has been stopped by the OFT from supplying and ...
A door supplier has been stopped by the OFT from supplying and

installing poor quality goods.

The owner of Surrey-based Specialist Doors, Mark Talbot, has given

written undertakings under the Stop Now Regulations that he will stop

breaching the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Assurances were

also provided by Mr Talbot under the provisions of Part III of the

Fair Trading Act 1973.

The OFT received a number of complaints from consumers that

Specialist Doors:

- supplied doors and fittings that were of unsatisfactory quality

- supplied doors not fit for their purpose

- supplied goods that did not match their description

- failed to deliver and/or fit goods within the agreed time or at all

- fitted goods without reasonable care and skill

The case was referred from Merton LBC trading standards service.

Complaints were also made against Specialist Doors and Windows Ltd,

of which Mr Talbot was a director until it went into liquidation in

May 2001. The undertakings and assurances cover any business that Mr

Talbot operates.

Any breach of the undertakings and/or assurances could lead to court

action.

Welcoming the assurances John Vickers, director general of Fair

Trading said:

'Consumers have a basic right to goods of satisfactory quality that

are fit for their purpose, match their description and are installed

properly. The OFT and trading standards services will act against

suppliers who breach these rights.'

NOTES

1. Under the Stop Now Regulations, the OFT can apply for a court

order against traders who breach or are threatening to breach a

number of laws harming the collective interests of consumers

covered by those laws. It can seek written assurances in lieu of

court action.

2. The Regulations cover the following areas: doorstep selling,

timeshare, unfair contract terms, consumer credit, distance

selling, package travel, package holidays and package tours,

misleading and comparative advertising, sale of goods rights, TV

broadcasting activities and advertising of medicinal products for

human use.

3. Part III of the Fair Trading Act 1973 provides that, where it

appears that a person has persisted in a course of conduct

detrimental to the interests of consumers and has broken his

obligations under criminal or civil law, the Director General of

Fair Trading can ultimately bring court proceedings for an Order.

4. Full details of the assurances given are as follows:

Mr Talbot will refrain from:

a) Continuing to consent to or connive at the course of conduct of:

1. Committing breaches of contract with consumers by supplying

goods which:

i) Are not of satisfactory quality as required by the Supply of

Goods and Services Act 1982

ii) Are not fit for the purpose for which they were purchased as

required by section 4(5) of the Supply of Goods and Services Act

1982

2. Committing breaches of contracts with consumers by failing to

carry out services with reasonable care and skill required by

section 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982

3. Committing breaches of contracts with consumers by supplying

goods, which do not correspond with the description applied to the

goods as required by section 3(2) of the Supply of Goods and

Services Act 1982

4. Committing breaches of contracts with consumers by failing to

install and or deliver goods or parts of goods within the time

agreed or, where no time was agreed, within a reasonable time as

required by section 14 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982

b) Carrying on the same or any similar course of conduct in the

course of any business, which at any time is carried on by him

c) Consenting to or conniving at the carrying on of any such course

of conduct by any other body corporate, in relation to which, at

any time when that course of conduct is carried on, he is (or

purports to act as) a director, manager, secretary or other similar

officer or in which he has, at that time, a controlling interest.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.