Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Graduates appear to earn very different amounts depending on the institution they attended, the subject studied and...
Graduates appear to earn very different amounts depending on the institution they attended, the subject studied and their social background. This is the conclusion reached in a new report issued by The Council for Industry and Higher Education (CIHE).

On average men with degrees in Mathematics, Engineering, Economics and Law earned over 20% more than someone with two or more A-levels three years after leaving university. But men with Arts degrees had on average a 4% wages penalty.

On average women with degrees in 'Health', Mathematics, Architecture, Economics and Law earned about 40% more than women with two or more A- levels. Those with Arts degrees had a more modest 17% earnings premium.

Oxbridge graduates earned about 8% more than graduates from an 'old' university while those who had attended a newer institution earned about 3 - 8 % less (depending on the year of graduation).

Those from lower social groups earned less irrespective of the institution they attended. So even those who graduated from Oxbridge in 1985 and 1990 earned on average about 16% less than those from professional families.

'There are some important messages here for potential students and those who advise them', said Richard Brown, chief executive of CIHE. 'To talk about average 'returns' is to miss the wide variation that exists.

'There are also implications for government policy. Just getting students from poor communities and comprehensive schools into so-called 'top' universities will not ensure that they then get the best jobs. Employers have to play their part in persuading prospective students that it is worth their while to invest in learning. They should consider their recruitment policies; the business benefits of having a diverse labour force that can relate to an equally diverse range of customers; the ethics of discriminating (however unwittingly) against older graduates or those from different social groups. There is a danger that some employers just recruit in their own image.'

The report Financial Returns to Undergraduates: a summary of recent evidence was written by Dr Gavan Conlon and Dr Arnaud Chevalier at the Centre for the Economics of Education at the LSE. It is available from CIHE price£5:

A follow-on report on good employer recruitment practices will be issued shortly. It includes general lessons and short case studies on six major employers.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.