Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A consultation paper on openness and accountability of public bodies in Scotland was published today by Scottish se...
A consultation paper on openness and accountability of public bodies in Scotland was published today by Scottish secretary Michael Forsyth.

It sets out plans to improve openness through increased accessibility and new appointments procedures, and it identifies steps already taken by the Scottish Office and public bodies themselves to improve their management and supervision.

Mr Forsyth said: 'I have decided to publish this document because of the increasing awareness and lively public debate over the accountability and accessibility of public bodies. I wish to dispel the misconceptions which surround these bodies, to show my commitment to the continuing pursuit of the highest standards and best practices in their management and supervision, and to give the opportunity for the widest possible expression of view on these issues. I want to ensure that non-departmental public bodies continue to be fully accountable to those they serve, and are seen to be so.

'The Scottish Office is responsible for more executive non- departmental public bodies than any other government department, reflecting my responsibilities as the secretary of state. They perform a vital role in securing the provision of a wide variety of services. They are held strictly to account for what they spend and their members are expected to conform to the highest traditions of public service, and give substantially of their time, often for little or nothing in the way of remuneration.

'I hope that the plans for change in this document will promote wider discussion of the issues set out here and I will welcome views on these.'

Proposed changes in the paper are:

-- All non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) to have a code of practice on openness and accessibility, based on guidance prepared by The Scottish Office, making information available about their activities and decisions

-- all NDPBs to have a code of best practice for board members

-- an advisory panel, containing independent members to advise on board member appointments to NDPBs, to be set up by each Scottish office department

-- advertising to be used to identify candidates for future appointment to NPDBs

-- a separate advisory panel to be set up to advise the secretary of state on the appointment of chairmen on health bodies

-- five-yearly reviews of NDPBs by Scottish Office to be given greater publicity and have more external participation

-- NHS Trusts which do not already do so to be encouraged to hold their formal meetings open to the public

The new procedures for appointments, including the introduction of independent advisers to scrutinise candidates, implement for the Scottish Office the government's acceptance of the recommendations of the first report of the Nolan Committee.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.