Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The timescale for developing comprehensive performance assessment is demanding - many have said it, and we are not ...
The timescale for developing comprehensive performance assessment is demanding - many have said it, and we are not arguing.

What has been hugely constructive from the outset is the extent to which councils have rolled up their sleeves to help devise and refine CPA.

The concept of corporate assessment is non-negotiable. The local government white paper states there will be streamlined regulation and local reports.

How this works when the meat is put on the bones is, to a large degree, up to local government itself, and our initial sketches are being revised in response to feedback.

Early comments said the assessments risked missing cross-cutting work on quality of life. As a result we have compiled quality of life profiles for each council, which will feed into CPA scores.

It became clear the approach to corporate assessment needed simplifying, so we have moved from a raft of questions to nine key themes - ambition, focus, prioritisation, capacity, performance management, achievement, learning, investment and future plans.

One of the hottest issues is how the different streams are labelled, and there is consensus that the four proposed categories - top, striving, coasting, failing - will change. Whatever descriptions are settled on must be two-dimensional, expressing both service quality and improvement. Such a radical change will need political support, but the government has indicated it is open-minded.

All 10 pathfinders have had a corporate assessment, and with them we are reviewing which areas of the process need tweaking. The roll-out to other single-tier councils is steaming ahead with the first tranche starting corporate assessments this month and the second already beginning self-assessment.

The deadlines are challenging, but it is essential we get it right. All our work is about ensuring the right ingredients are to hand when it comes to making the final product in the autumn.

This will combine the service judgments (Ofsted, Social Services Inspectorate, Best Value Inspection Service, housing, environment, leisure, culture), quality of life profiles, financial audit, performance indicators and corporate assessment results. The proportion of each will be critical and we are expecting a lively debate when consultation on these weightings starts this summer.

Paul Kirby


Audit Commission Inspection Service

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.