Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Peers from all sides of the Lords pressed the government to save the counties in a four and a half hour debate on t...
Peers from all sides of the Lords pressed the government to save the counties in a four and a half hour debate on the Local Government Commission.

Cross bench peer Lord Cornwallis led the assault in last week's debate, accusing the government of imposing unnecessary change which would weaken local government power.

'I believe the review was originally instituted to deal with change in three specific places, since when it seems to have spread like an epidemic of measles across the country', he said.

The number of elected members in his home county of Kent could be reduced from 805 to 375 if unitary authorities were introduced, he said.

'This is at the same time as we are witnessing an increasing number of appointed bodies. What does this change in the balance between elected and appointed bodies portend'?

Lord Cornwallis highlighted the threat the government posed to the supposed independence of the Local Government Commission.

'Refusal by the government to accept the commission's recommendations for Derbyshire, Durham and Gloucestershire can only lead one to believe that they will only accept recommendations that coincide with their own pre-conceived wishes', he said.

Lord Bancroft, who was DoE permanent secretary from 1975 to 1977, said powerful local government was an essential counter balance to a wilful and over powerful central government.

'It is an open secret that at least twice the government has considered abandoning the review. Why not stop it now'? he asked.

Estimates of the costs of reorganisation varied wildly. While Lord Cornwallis claimed it would take 100 years to make a net saving in Kent, Labour peer Lord Jacques claimed the costs of making Portsmouth a unitary authority would be recouped in three and a half years.

By the time junior environment minister the Earl of Arran rose to reply to the debate 37 peers had said that they supported the survival of county councils compared with six who spoke in favour of unitary authorities.

He stressed the independence of the Local Government Commission and the importance the government attached to ensuring the benefits of reorganisation outweighed the costs of disruption.

He rejected the Association of County Councils' estimate that reorganisation would cost £1.1 billion.

The Earl of Arran said the estimates of savings expected by reorganising Cleveland and the Isle of Wight were encouraging.

'No change would indeed mean no transitional costs, but it would also mean no long term savings', he said.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.