Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The DoE has refused to rule out deregulation of the local government superannuation scheme despite near unanimous o...
The DoE has refused to rule out deregulation of the local government superannuation scheme despite near unanimous opposition to the idea from local government. It announced this week it is launching a value for money study into options for deregulation. The study which is due to be completed by April 1995 will also investigate the costs of current arrangements. The decision to launch the study was taken as part of the DoE's response to last year's efficiency scrutiny of the LGSS.

The DoE received more than 200 responses to the scrutiny report. It recommended in the medium term councils should take responsibility for pension provision.

While most local government respondents opposed this, ministers have decided to 'accept it for further investigation', according to a letter from the DoE's Terry Crossley to chief executives this week On the basis of the value for money study's findings the DoE will decide whether or not to pursue deregulation.

Mr Crossley, who heads up the DoE unit which runs the LGSS, told an LGC pensions seminar on Monday the study would look at various options including the status quo. Deregulation options to be studied include: setting up a national scheme run by local government; individual trust schemes for each council; a trust scheme managed by a lead authority; or a regionally based trust scheme.

Brian Russell, secretary of the UK Steering Committee which oversees the scheme on behalf of local government, said the study should prove the current arrangements are cost effective. The UKSC has argued that any savings for the DoE from deregulation would be outweighed by additional administrative and legal costs for councils.

'The DoE seems generally to have followed the proposals of local government. But we are concerned they are continuing with possible deregulation of the scheme', said Mr Russell.

'We will do everything we can to help with the value for money study but local government was nearly unanimous in saying no to that idea'. Ministers have postponed a decision on the report's second most controversial recommendation: that individual authorities should be allowed to opt out of the LGSS for new employees in advance of deregulation. This will be looked at in the light of legislation resulting from the government's response to recommendations from the pension law review committee.

The DoE will discuss with other departments the recommendation that employers may contribute to personal pension plans. The decision coincides with advice from the UKSC that councils should let people back into the scheme if they left it for personal pension plans. The UKSC estimates between 30 and 40 people per pension authority may seek readmittance.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.