Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A bitter dispute between rival developers over which should have the right to build a new superstore for the town o...
A bitter dispute between rival developers over which should have the right to build a new superstore for the town of Towcester was thrown open again by a judge in London's High Court.

Judge David Widdicombe QC quashed the Environment Secretary's decision to grant planning permission for the development proposals put forward by Claymount Properties Ltd. Also quashed was the Minister's decision not to 'call in' Claymount's application for his own personal consideration as he had done with a rival scheme put forward by Morbaine Ltd.

The judge said 'I am not sorry to have reached this conclusion ... in this case I felt no doubt that justice was not being done and that the correct balance was not being struck.

The local authority was anxious that Claymount's application to construct a 15,000 square foot superstore off Tiffield Road, Towcester, should also be called in by the Secretary of State so the rival schemes could be considered together. The council and Morbaine Limited sought Judicial Review of the Secretary of State's refusal to take that court, said the judge.

And Judge Widdicombe said the Minister was subject to 'unofficial guidelines' that, where there were two alternative planning applications, he was obliged to give reasons for 'calling in' one but not the other. He had given no such reasons for refusing to call in Claymount's application and the Secretary of State's decision was therefore quashed.

The court heard Claymount was granted planning permission for its scheme on the recommendation of an Environment Ministry Inspector after an inquiry in February this year. That decision was also quashed after Judge Widdicombe found thE Inspector had wrongly interpreted a critical planning policy. Judge Widdicombe's ruling means that the Secretary of State must now reconsider his decision not to 'call in' Claymount's planning application.

The planning permission granted to Claymount was also quashed and the Secretary of State must also now consider that application afresh.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.