Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The proposed planning gain supplement (PGS) could give councils a new source of money to support prudential borrowi...
The proposed planning gain supplement (PGS) could give councils a new source of money to support prudential borrowing, the Treasury has said.

Developers would contribute to infrastructure costs by paying the tax on the increase caused in land values when planning permission is given (LGC, 8 December).

Speaking last week at a House of Commons' communities & local government committee, Treasury financial secretary John Healey said: 'If PGS provides a revenue stream for councils there is the capacity to use that as part of prudential borrowing to raise capital.'

A Local Government Association spokesman said: 'PGS could finance the costs of prudential borrowing, which does not get revenue support. It is good he [Mr Healey] has recognised that.'

Most of the PGS money will be returned by Whitehall to the council where it was raised, though some will be kept for regional infrastructure projects.

Mr Healey said there would be a further consultation over the level of the tax, which the government has said would be 'modest'.

It is expected to be launched in 2008 with a 20% tax rate.

He said: 'We see it as a local measure to ensure local areas benefit and have the resources required for infrastructure when there is growth.'

Housing and planning minister Yvette Cooper said councils might be free to use the money as they chose.

She said: 'It could be ringfenced for [infrastructure] capital projects or it could be up to a local authority to decide how spend it because they are the democratically accountable body.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.