Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The government is to review the detail of the regulations that govern politically-restricted posts in local governm...
The government is to review the detail of the regulations that govern politically-restricted posts in local government, local government minister Hilary Armstrong has announced.

She also announced that the government will contest a case referred to the European Court of Human Rights, of four senior local authority employees who have complained that the rules on politically-restricted posts in local government violate fundamental freedoms enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

Ms Armstrong said:

'We are firmly committed to the tradition - long held in this country - of political impartiality by senior officials employed both in central and local government.

'The regulations on politically restricted posts in local government must uphold this principle. However, the current regulations were drafted at a time of conflict between central and local government. Some of the detail, therefore, may reflect that confrontational flavour, obscuring the clarity of that fundamental principle. Over the coming months we want to review that detail. If necessary we shall then amend the regulations.

'We shall be looking in particular at the level and number of officers covered by the rules, and shall want to be sure that the language of the rules does not leave room for over-zealous interpretation. We shall also want to satisfy ourselves that the detail of the restrictions imposed is essential for the maintenance of political impartiality.

'In the case now referred to the European Court of Human Rights*, the European Commission of Human Rights found that the applicants' freedom of expression had been violated because they had been prevented from engaging in political activity. In their reasoning the commission question the principle, fundamental to our democracy, that senior and other front-line public servants, in all their public conduct, should act in a manner which guarantees public confidence that they are discharging their official duties in a politically-impartial way. The government shall contest any challenge to this principle.'

*Application 22954/93: Ahmed and others v UK


1. The Local Government and Housing Act 1989 imposes political restrictions on the three highest categories of local government

officer; it then requires local authorities to list other officers who fall within one of two categories, first those whose pay exceeds a certain level and, second, those whose duties involve giving advice to the authority on a regular basis or speaking on a regular basis to journalists or broadcasters on behalf of the authority. The Local Government Officers (political Restrictions) Regulations 1990 set out the nature of the restrictions on political activity which apply

to officers in politically restricted posts.

2. Complaints that fundamental freedoms enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights have been violated are made initially to the European Commission of Human Rights. In this case, the commission has referred the report of its findings to the European Court of Human Rights. The case is to be heard before the Court on 22 April 1998.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.