Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Business backs efficient unitaries

  • Comment

The business community in Buckinghamshire wanted more effective and efficient government so much that it crowdfunded £25,000 to conduct research into different unitary authority models for the county.

The conclusion of the report? Buckinghamshire would save over £20m a year by streamlining its five local authorities - one county and four districts - into one, with all upfront costs of implementation being repaid after one-and-a-half years or earlier. The report concluded that no change was not an option.

Were we living in times of unbridled prosperity we would still be looking for ways to make our local authorities more streamlined and efficient, but with austerity the name of the game for the foreseeable future, £20m in annual savings is a winning ticket.

Buckinghamshire is not alone in this thinking. That is why Cheshire East Council’s leader has floated combining into a unitary authority; why local authorities in Cumbria, Leicestershire and elsewhere are discussing similar proposals; and why an ex-MP in Lancashire has called for a single council in the east of the county. This is a popular idea for good reason: it will create the potential for stronger local economic and social leadership.

Businesses and residents increasingly feel they want more of a say in this debate because, as ever they will have to pick up the financial slack. It is interesting in this context that Chorley BC has recently suggested a local referendum on the same issue.

The business community wants all the great government we can afford, with a strong emphasis on ‘great’ and ‘afford’. This is why in Bucks it has funded research into the possibilities for change.

General election candidates should be asked to make clear to their constituents where they stand on this issue. It would surely be anti-democratic to plan to reconsider the constitution in which they would be personally conflicted at a later date and behind closed doors.

In an age of transparency, a system of local government focused on the most effective impact possible on local economic and social realities and priorities is what we need. Those in power should not be able to dictate the terms of that power: that right belongs to the residents and businesses they serve. The time has arrived to ensure the power stays where it should - with the local people and businesses who pay for our government.

Philippa Batting, managing director, Buckinghamshire Business First

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.