Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Change is inexorably one way

  • Comment

The news that education secretary Michael Gove intends to appoint eight regional ‘schools chancellors’ will not come as a surprise to students of centralised England.

It was inevitable that academies and free schools would require some sort of sub-national oversight: a single local education authority for England (the Department for Education), based in Sanctuary Buildings, was never going to be a long-term solution.

Eric Pickles may not like regions, but many of his colleagues do. As England moves ever closer to being a single unit of government with 100% of taxes set centrally and virtually all public services controlled from Whitehall, there will be a growing need for regional and sub-regional machinery to handle the plethora of micro-quangos that provide services. The NHS has appointed regional directors to “provide strategic leadership for the NHS Commissioning Board across [each] region”. The business department runs a ‘Regional Growth Fund’. Official statistics are still published on a regional basis.

The Labour Party’s police commission, headed by Lord Stevens, reported on Monday that: “it is difficult, even impossible, to sustain the argument that 43 police forces is the most economic, efficient or effective way to deliver strategic policing support”. There should, the commission recommends, be a much smaller number of forces, or possibly one each for England and for Wales, though with local policing functions being handled by smaller units inside each mega-force.

A single force for England (and separately for Wales) with local sub-divisions would be similar to the arrangement put in place in Scotland in April this year.

The regionalisation of England looks set to get a new lease of life as reforms to education, the NHS and police push towards a smaller number of north-west and East Midlands-scale governance mechanisms.

Indeed, with the emergence of ‘city regions’ and pressures for something similar in counties, it is almost inevitable that a future government will, in the name of efficiency, radically reduce the number of councils in England. Such a reform would doubtless soon be followed by the emergence of regional-local government. England is heading for a form of ‘plural centralism’, with regional agencies responsible for local services. Change is inexorably one way.

Tony Travers, director, Greater London Group, London

School of Economics

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.