Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Blueprint revealed for shake-up in council services

  • Comment

The Welsh government has unveiled its blueprint for radical reform of local government, amidst claims that it is planning to merge councils “by the back door”, the BBC reports.

It wants six new regional groups to run services such as education and social care, rather than the 22 unitary authorities. There are no plans for a cut in Wales’s 1,264 councillors.

The six proposed regions are North Wales, Mid and West Wales, Swansea Bay, Cwm Taf, Cardiff and Vale and Gwent.

Liberal Democrat local government spokesman Peter Black said he was in favour of cutting the number of councils, but accused the government of reorganisation “by the back door”.

He told the BBC: “This is a blueprint for reorganisation. I’m OK about having that debate, but let’s have that debate, not ease our way there surreptitiously.

“Let’s have a proper debate about whether we’re going to reorganise or not instead of trying to do it by the back door.”

The Welsh government rejected that this was a back door re-organisation.

The news follows Welsh local government Carl Sargeant (Lab) warning councils in June that they will be forced to appoint joint chief executives and even merge if they do not speed up collaborative working.

Mr Sargeant told councillors and chief officers he would intervene if he did not see more partnership working between Welsh councils.

“I am tired of hearing the arguments against joint appointments. They are often no more than a defence of the status quo,” he said. “In the last year five authorities have lost a chief executive and not one has made a joint appointment. That makes no sense at all.”

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.