Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Delayed Localism Bill published

  • 1 Comment

Local authorities and some town and parish councils are to get a ‘general power of competence’, under plans set out in the delayed Localism Bill.

The legislation was finally and briefly introduced into the House of Commons on Monday night for its first reading and is set to be discussed more fully by MPs during a second reading.

As well as proposals on senior pay, mayors, council tax referendums, social housing reform, the bill sets out long-awaited detail on a general power of competence which is set to give local authorities more freedom.

However, as previously reported by LGC, the legislation allows the secretary of state to limit how councils exercise the power.

While the power of general competence and other parts of the Localism Bill has been welcomed by the Local Government Association, a spokesman for the body said the bill showed how ministers have struggled to implement their “post-bureaucratic age”. The association counted 142 separate instances where the detail and implementation of the bill would be taken forward through “regulations, order-making powers, duties, statutory guidance and requirements on local authorities”.

Perhaps the most significant aspect of the bill revolves around the creation of directly elected mayors. The secretary of state will have the power to put shadow elected mayors in place and to initiate a mayoral referendum. Intruigingly, however, the bill contains a reserve power for the secretary of state to transfer to a mayor any function of any public body.

The LGA described the power as potentially having “huge significance” and that it could “support the delivery of increasingly accountable, cohesive and efficient public services”.

In an initial response to the bill the LGA were also highly critical of plans to make councils contribute towards EU fines.

A spokesman said the measure “has been imposed without any consultation with the sector” and would result in a “significant and unjustified financial strain” on councils. “The EU treaty clearly states that only governments are liable for fines,” the spokesman added.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Despite the title of the Bill, it appears to pave the way, as usual, for several volumes of unnecessary and over-prescriptive secondary legislation.

    The Bill would be greatly improved by the addition of the word "not" in the oft-repeated phrase: "The Secretary of State may by regulations ...."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.