Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Graham Stuart: Councils must stop treating home educators with suspicion

  • Comment

Parents who have opted to home educate their children are often left bruised and bewildered by the attitude of their local authorities.

Educating a child at home is a parent’s preferred choice in a minority of cases. Mostly, they do so because their child is struggling to thrive or cope in mainstream schooling. They want the best for their child, yet too often they are made to feel under suspicion by the local authority that should be there to support them.

Parents, not the state, have the statutory duty to educate their children, yet when parents do so directly, officials often think parents are obliged to prove to them that the child is receiving a suitable education. Worse, councils often conflate home education with a child safeguarding risk and seek to impose routine monitoring and inspections. These actions are at odds with government guidelines and can be accompanied by misrepresentation of the legal situation both on parents’ doorsteps and in local authority literature.  

This attitude is counterproductive. Local authorities should be the servants and not the masters in their relationships with home educators. The limited resources councils have available should be used to give educational support to parents, such as teaching materials or exam fees. This would not only be beneficial to the child, but could also foster a better relationship with home educating parents.

The confrontational attitude of some local authorities is, I hope, on the wane. Cambridgeshire CC, for example, has in the past year completely changed its home education service.

The monitoring regime was contentious with local home educators, including its insistence on annual inspections, but now, the local authority assumes parents are providing suitable education for their children unless evidence suggests they are not.

Cambridgeshire will pay a contribution towards home educated children’s year 11 exam fees and is looking to purchase careers advice for home educators and information sessions from the educational psychology service. The council is also approaching local colleges to see if home educators can use science laboratories.

Regular information drop-in sessions will be set up throughout the county. Also, the home education service has briefed children’s services and there will be engagement with health services to increase awareness about the law on home education.

The changes in Cambridgeshire are a model of good practice. It takes political courage to view home education as good rather than as a risk but, if councillors in Cambridgeshire can do it, others can too.

Graham Stuart (Con), MP for Beverley and Holderness, and the chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on home education

 

 

 

 

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.