Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Set your own business rates, Osborne tells sector

  • 3 Comments

Councils will be handed the power to set business rates and will be able to keep all of the income raised by 2020, chancellor George Osborne has announced.

In his speech to the Conservative conference, Mr Osborne said local government grant from Whitehall would be phased out and councils will be allowed to keep all of the £26bn collected in business rates and effectively set their own business rates.

All councils will be allowed to cut rates but only cities with elected mayors will have the power to raise them, to boost spending on infrastructure.

According to a Tory briefing paper, the reform will include an extension of the “top ups and tariffs” system, which redistributes business rates income between authorities.

The safety net regime which protects councils against large year to year drops in business rates will remain but the growth levy – which claws money back from areas that see high annual rates of growth for use in other places – will be abolished.

Mr Osborne said: “Right now we have the merry go round of clawing back local taxes into the Treasury and handing them out again in the form of a grant.

“In my view, proud cities and counties should not be forced to come to national government with a begging bowl.

“So I am announcing this: today I am embarking on the biggest transfer of power to our local government in living memory.

“We are going to allow them to keep the rates they collect from business.”

The chancellor said councils would eventually be allowed to hold on to £26bn of business rates income that is currently retained by Whitehall.

“Right now, we collect much more in business rates than we give back in the main grant,” he told the conference. “So we will phase out this local government grant altogether.”

The extra income from business rates will be accompanied by more power and responsibility being devolved down to local authorities, the chancellor added.

“So this is what our plan means: attract a business, and you attract more money. Regenerate a high street, and you’ll reap the benefits. Grow your area, and you’ll grow your revenue too.”

In a further move to encourage councils and city mayors to boost economic growth, Mr Osborne said he would also hand them the power to set their own business rates.

“We’re going to abolish the uniform business rate entirely,” he added.

“Any local area will be able to cut business rates as much as they like to win new jobs and generate wealth. It’s up to them to judge whether they can afford it. It’s called having power and taking responsibility.”

Elected mayors of big cities would get even greater power over business rates, the chancellor told the conference.

“Provided they have the support of the local business community, these mayors will be able to add a premium to the rates to pay for new infrastructure and build for their cities’ future.

“Yes, further savings to be made in local government, but radical reform too. So an end to the uniform business rate.

“Money raised locally, spent locally. Every council able to cut business taxes. Every mayor able to build for their city’s future. A new way to govern our country.

“Power to the people. Let the devolution revolution begin.”

Mayors’ power to raise business rates was “likely” to be limited to 2p on the rate, the Treasury confirmed in a press statement, released shortly after the chancellor’s speech.

Jonathan House, a partner in PwC’s government and public sector team described the  business rate reform as “an important measure to support regional cities, towns and counties to be engines for their own growth”.

“Retaining local business rates will better incentivise economic development and enable local voices to define clearly how this should happen,” he added.

“Success will come to those areas that can readily differentiate themselves from their competitors and really attract and support business growth.”

“The private sector is the vital engine for job creation and growth and this initiative should pave the way for councils to use these new powers to attract businesses and regenerate high-streets.”

A recent PwC survey of council leaders found that 92% thought they should have control over setting business rates.

Nick Forbes (Lab), leader of Newcastle City Council, warned the retention of business rates risked entrenching inequality in some areas.

“Business rate retention is good, but without a redistribution mechanism it will further entrench inequalities in areas with a low tax base.”

The reform was welcome by the District Councils Network, which said district councils had long argued “that districts need incentives that are significant, predictable and permanent to stimulate business growth in our areas”.

DCN director Stephen Brown pointed to the need to “delve beyond the headline announcement to fully grasp the details and implications for our members”.

 

 

 

 

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • If local people were worried about uncontrolled development under the current arrangements, just wait until councils see the only way of maintaining services, or even just surviving, is to permit a major, controversial commercial, or industrial development in their area.
    Non-domestic rates in this country are in a mess and the government has sidestepped reform, by now making it a local government problem.
    What of those areas that have only a few, but at the same time, very large commercial/industrial rate payers, that are also the main local employers and have run into financial difficulties? The local council(s) will now, in theory, have the power to offer them some direct financial support through the business rate system. However, offering such help will also blow a big hole in their respective budgets, directly impact the services they provide to those same people now in danger of losing their jobs. Talk about a Catch 22 situation!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For me the main danger is that local authorities compete with each other by setting lower rates, so that although the percentage take goes up, the overall quantum goes down. This is a very slipperly slope. The evidence produced by the LGIU a couple of years back based on experience from the USA showed clearly that competing over business rates does not raise business growth in the economy overall - it just distributes it to the places that offer the most attactive rates, which will only serve to further entrench the unequal distribution of growth opportunities.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Er I'm not old but can remember when Councils set the business rates. It's only 25 years ago!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.