Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Small trusts 'hit by raised efficiency assumption'

  • Comment

Raised efficiency assumptions could have an impact on small and medium sized trusts’ ability to provide good quality patient care, Monitor has warned.


It came as the regulator confirmed it is to investigate the challenges faced by small hospitals across the country.

LGC’s sister title HSJ revealed in June it would be investigating the challenges faced by smaller district general hospitals with an income of £300m or less.

The financial situation of Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust, which was at the centre of the care crisis subject to a public inquiry, is said to mirror that of many smaller district general hospitals across England.

The trust was put into special administration after it was deemed to be “financially and clinically unsustainable”.

The administrators recommended the trust should be dissolved and have recently been given more time to submit their final report to the health regulator.

Monitor is now planning to examine whether small, non-specialist, district general hospitals are facing difficulties in delivering high quality, sustainable services.

Monitor chief executive David Bennett said: “We have an important job to do in making sure that the whole sector works in the best interests of patients and understanding the pressures on small hospitals is an important part of that job.

“Smaller acute providers are an integral part of the NHS and we want to know more about the pressures they face.”

Monitor regulator and NHS England jointly announced earlier this month that efficiency assumptions would be raised from 1.5 per cent to 1.9 per cent in 2014-15.

The regulator’s board papers for October state that “small and medium sized acute foundation trusts were the worst performing with EBITDA [earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation - basic measure of earnings against costs] margins of 3.3 per cent and 4.1 per cent respectively”.

The papers state that board members “considered the implications that deficits and efficiency assumptions could have on trusts’ ability to provide good quality patient care”.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.