Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Town halls delivering economic objectives

Tony Travers
  • 1 Comment

We are told to expect a ‘Budget for Growth’ next week.

After almost a year devoted to slashing the deficit, chancellor George Osborne is now moving on to an attempt to strengthen the economy. In particular, the government will be trying to fix the local economies of places that have, despite over four decades of public policy, remained in decline.

No one knows whether such measures will be successful in stimulating the private sector to generate jobs

Cutting the deficit will lead to reduced public spending, which is predicted, in turn, to produce higher levels of unemployment in areas heavily dependent on public sector jobs. Local enterprise partnerships, the regional growth fund and enterprise zones (EZs) are building blocks of the government’s early efforts to produce an economic policy. Tax increment finance (TIF) is also likely to be part of the mixture.

No one knows whether such measures will be successful in stimulating the private sector to generate jobs, particularly in places where the economy has been in structural decline for many years.

In parallel, ministers are about to go public with the details of their review into the local government funding system. It is likely Eric Pickles will propose the local retention of business rates. This reform, coupled with the New Homes Bonus, will be intended to create incentives for councils to expand their council tax and non-domestic rate base: more planning permissions would lead to more local tax - at least where there is pressure to develop.

Policies such as LEPs, EZs and TIFs may turn out to be the greater part of the government’s overall economic growth policy. Mr Osborne, in common with most recent British chancellors, has shown no interest in old-fashioned ‘industrial’ planning. Efforts to incentivise local economies, in total, will be the nearest we get to such a policy.

Local government will, therefore, have a key role in facilitating economic growth. Councils’ planning, economic development and housing policies may need to change for them to benefit fully from the policies on offer. Similarly, it is hard to imagine new, localist, institutions collectively delivering such pro-growth outcomes. Unless local authorities can use the government’s various grants, tax breaks and incentive mechanisms to full effect, little will happen.

Put simply, Whitehall will to a significant extent depend on town halls to deliver government economic objectives.

Tony Travers, director, Greater London Group, London School of Economics

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Neil McInroy

    Tony,

    You could be right. In the absence of national industrial policy, it will be left to the component parts- local areas.

    However, the key flaws in this potentially positive trajectory are twofold. Firstly, potential effectiveness of these policies. Given the deep rooted capital aversion from some localities, labour market problems and skills issues, these policies are unlikely to be penetrative enough or have the required policy heave and thus gain sufficient traction to make a difference.

    Secondly, Local government is losing local economic development capacity via efficiencies and there is growing deficit in economic knowledge and understanding. As I have written elsewhere on these pages, there is a local economic development crisis brewing. Local government is poorly placed, and financially fettered to take on this much needed task.

    We can only hope the government addresses these problems quickly and introduces a national industrial strategy with attached resources, and supports local gvernment in implementing bespoke local economic development policy and action.

    Neil McInroy, CLES

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.