Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Northern Devon Healthcare Trust

Trust calls for success regime to take over ‘shambolic’ procurement

  • Comment

Northern Devon Healthcare Trust has called for a controversial community services procurement to be taken over by NHS England or the county’s ‘success regime’.

  • Northern Devon Healthcare Trust calls for NHS England or success regime to intervene in community services procurement
  • Trust claims NEW Devon CCG procurement “manifestly shambolic”
  • Northern Devon threatens CCG and Royal Devon and Exeter FT with CIP liability “buy out” claim if contract lost


The trust said Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group’s approach to the procurement had been “shambolic”. It also threatened to make the CCG or the new provider “buy out” cost savings earmarked for the contract, LGC’s sister title Health Service Journal reports.

The trust’s comments came in a submission to Monitor, which is investigating NEW Devon’s decision to choose, without going to full tender, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust as preferred provider for a £100m community services contract in the eastern part of the CCG’s patch

Northern Devon district hospital

Relationship between Northern Devon Healthcare Trust and NEW Devon CCG have been strained for some time

The probe was launched in January following a complaint from Northern Devon, the incumbent provider, which claimed the CCG’s process was not competitive or transparent and was affected by conflicts of interest.

Last month Monitor published its interim findings, which said while the CCG “would be likely to be in breach” of procurement regulations if it awarded the contract without further assurance work, it had not yet broken the rules.

In its submission to the Monitor following the provisional judgement, Northern Devon said it disagreed with the findings.

It said: “It would be perverse and irrational to find that because the CCG will seek further information from Royal Devon and Exeter within a ‘due diligence process’ the CCG has not breached the [regulations].”

“The CCG has already unfairly ruled out [Northern Devon] from further consideration as a result of a process that (as Monitor has provisionally found) did not comply with the [regulations].”

Northern Devon said the CCG’s approach to the procurement was “manifestly shambolic”. It called for the rest of the process to be overseen by NHS England or the “success regime” – the national programme for turning around troubled health economies. The county was placed in the regime in June.

In its submission to Monitor, Northern Devon also made a new claim that a cost improvement plan worth “several million pounds” would be put at risk if community services transfer to Royal Devon.

It said it would “still need to deliver the [cost improvement programme]” if it lost the contract, and would therefore “require either [Royal Devon] or the CCG to ‘buy out’ this liability on transfer if this occurs prior to March 2016”.

In their response to Monitor’s provisional judgement, NEW Devon said it welcomed the findings, which would “assist… in further enhancing the next phase of the process as the CCG conducts the strategic and transitional due diligence ahead of contract award”.

Relations between Northern Devon and the CCG have been strained for some time – a fact acknowledged last December, by the then chief executive of the NHS Trust Development Authority, David Flory.

Monitor’s final judgment on the procurement is expected in the coming weeks.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.