Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Absences likely to rise, says CIPD

  • Comment

Absence levels in the public sector are higher than other sectors and are unlikely to reduce in the future, the Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (CIPD) has warned.

The body’s annual absence survey shows that the most common cause of long-term absence among all employees is stress which is, in turn, often caused by organisational change and restructuring.

The figures show that 73% of manual and 79% of non-manual public sector employers rate stress as a top-five common cause of absence, compared to an average across all sectors of 51% and 63% respectively.

More than a third of all employers said stress-related absence has increased over the past year and is the main cause for persistently high levels of long-term public sector absence.

Just over half of public sector employers said organisational change and restructuring was a top-three cause of work-related stress, compared to a third in other sectors.

CIPD adviser Dr Jill Miller said the data showed why reducing public sector absences to private sector levels was so hard.

“Compared to the private sector, more public sector employees are in challenging public facing roles such as social work, policing, teaching and nursing where they often have to deal with people in difficult and emotionally charged situations, putting pressure on their time and resilience,” she said.

“In addition, organisational change and restructuring is cited more commonly by public sector employers than those in other sectors as a major cause of stress, which will only increase in the near future as a consequence of the recent comprehensive spending review.”

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.