Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Lord Hanningfield trial starts

  • Comment

A Tory peer accused of fiddling his House of Lords expenses was on a plane to India when he claimed for overnight accommodation in London, a court has heard

Lord Hanningfield, who is being tried under his name Paul White, made various claims for accommodation expenses incurred after performing his duties in the House of Lords between March 2006 and April 2009 but he did not stay at hotels in the capital, Chelmsford Crown Court was told.

The former leader of Essex County Council would claim for hotel costs but travel back to his home in West Hanningfield, near Chelmsford, Essex, said prosecutor Clare Montgomery QC.

He never stayed overnight in London at any stage during the period in the charges

Prosecutor Clare Montgomery

She said: “We will call evidence to establish that each one of Lord Hanningfield’s claims for night subsistence was false.

“He never stayed overnight in London at any stage during the period in the charges. On the vast majority of nights he went home to West Hanningfield.

“On the few occasions he did not, he was not in London. He was variously on an airplane bound for India or at hotels outside London all paid for by someone else, mainly Essex CC.”

Miss Montgomery suggested that, on some occasions, White would make false claims for travelling expenses to mask dishonest claims for overnight subsistence.

She told jurors: “You will need to consider whether the false travel claims were deliberately designed by Lord Hanningfield to hide the fact that he returned home to Hanningfield every night, normally by car.

“Was this because Lord Hanningfield knew that if he had accurately reported his journey home, it would have been obvious that he was not entitled to be paid overnight subsistence since he would not have had, or needed to have, any overnight accommodation in London?”

Miss Montgomery highlighted some of the instances when White was said to have made false claims for travel costs. She said that in March 2006, White made claims for travel every Friday of the month, when the Lords rarely sit on Fridays. He also claimed for a 15-mile journey from Chelmsford railway station to his home in West Hanningfield when the journey was actually only 7.5 miles, jurors were told.

Miss Montgomery said the finance department of the House of Lords, which authorised expense claims, operated largely on a “system of trust”.

She added: “The prosecution case is that Lord Hanningfield took advantage of the system of trust to make false claims for travel and overnight accommodation in the six monthly claim forms with which he is charged.”

The trial judge, Mr Justice Saunders, allowed White to sit behind his team of lawyers instead of in the dock because of hearing difficulties.

White, wearing a dark suit, a white stripped shirt and a grey patterned tie, listened intently as Miss Montgomery addressed the jury of three men and nine women.

The judge earlier told the press they could use the micro-blogging site Twitter from inside the courtroom to report the case as it progressed.

The 70-year-old denies six counts of false accounting.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.