Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

District opposition creates race against time for reorganisation


Buckinghamshire’s districts have all rejected the government order that would pave the way for a county unitary council.

The county council and Aylesbury Vale, Chiltern, South Buckinghamshire and Wycombe DCs are due to be merged into a new unitary in 2020.

The districts’ opposition mean communities secretary James Brokenshire will have to legislate for the new council before the end of March unless he can win them round.

An Aylesbury Vale report explained that Mr Brokenshire can create the new unitary either under part of the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act 2016 that permits this if all councils agree, or by a different clause that requires the consent of only one council. The latter provision is though due to expire at the end of March.

Cabinet meetings at each district last week decided the changes as they stood were contrary to residents’ interests and that they would take legal advice.

One key dispute is over the number of councillors, with the county council pressing for 98 and the districts for 147 – three rather than two for each new ward.

The county council, which first made the unitary proposal, was alone in supporting the proposed order.

Leader Martin Tett (Con) said: “Timing to get the new council up and running is tight, so I’m asking the district councils to work with us on this for our residents and our staff to deliver the brand new council that Buckinghamshire deserves and make the most of the opportunities for all from this historic change.”


Readers' comments (2)

  • Correction for accuracy to your sub title. The SoS announced on the 1st November a new single Unitary District Council, not a County Council. The announcement states that BCC will not be a continuing council, and all 5 councils including Districts will be dissolved and a new council formed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 147 is a ridiculous number - almost 50% more than Birmingham! It might also reveal a subconscious desire to snooker the proposals with a maximum break!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.