Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Rob Whiteman: Hammond must understand, councils need cash

  • Comment

In 2008 the chancellor Alistair Darling predicted in his autumn statement it would take years of cuts to get public finances back to health.

A decade later the current chancellor Philip Hammond has declared an end to ten long years of fiscal retrenchment with a raft of spending decisions. But will the so-called ‘Phil-good’ Budget actually make any difference to the perilous finances of local government?

Despite sizeable injections of cash – £650m for social care, £45m for disabled facilities and £420m for potholes – I remain unconvinced.

Unfortunately, these short-term spending decisions, however welcome, will not go far enough to sustain local authorities. If the government is committed to the sustainability of councils then it must be bolder, braver and think for the longer term.

Our latest performance tracker, produced jointly with the Institute for Government, hammers home the scale of the fiscal challenge facing local authorities.

It highlighted how the significant spending pressures, along with rising demand in adult social care, have led to local authorities scaling back on activities, think culture and youth services, while steadily shifting the cost of services like garden waste onto individuals where they can.

These findings, along with other reports from the National Audit Office and the public accounts committee released this summer, put serious question marks over the capacity of local authorities to weather the storms on the horizon.

Given the disconnect between diminishing resources and rising demand, the near impossible ambition of business rates retention and the fair funding review to bring about needed reform, the pace of the devolution agenda and the economic fallout of Brexit, there can be no doubt a cold snap is on its way.

It is essential then the government use all its means to ensure the sector does not buckle under the huge financial strain.

The Hudson review has helped outline what steps must be taken. As former director general at the Treasury, Andrew Hudson recommended that the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government focus on the deliverability of policy changes, make the settlement process more robust, ensure the skills of staff, improve communication with councils, and have peer challenge and external scrutiny play a bigger role – something which we particularly welcome.

Responding to the review, MHCLG has already implemented consistent settlement dates, and so we are optimistic that they will seek to introduce the rest of the recommendations.

But it is imperative that the government does more. This must include issuing the long-awaited green paper on adult social care as soon as possible, reviewing the statutory requirements of councils, giving local authorities more clarity over Brexit, ensuring chief financial officers have a role on the top table and report to the chief executive, and fashioning a more sustainable funding solution.

The collective failure that led to the demise of Northamptonshire CC shows how important it is that chief financial officers are supported and empowered to challenge organisational risks and advise elected members and chief executives where they have concerns.

Difficult advice must be welcomed and heard at the top table at all times, something which I fear is not happening at all councils, especially where the 151 officer does not sit at that table.

On fashioning a sustainable funding solution, rather than continuing to focus on how best to divide the funding pie up, we must look at how to boost resources available to councils. The only ways of doing so will be to continue rationing local services or to give councils fiscal powers to introduce local tax measures, such as on sales, tourism and other sources of income.

Unfortunately, the chancellor reduced the tax take at a time he should be looking to increase it, implying he does not understand there is simply not enough cash to sustain the expectations of public services.

Our hope now rests on the ability of the spending review to plug the widening holes. But, as the Budget’s red book shows that spending by 2023 will fall far short of 2010-11 levels, I am not holding my breath.

Rob Whiteman, chief executive, Chartered Institute of Public Finance & Accountancy

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.