Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Analysis: Survival-focused Cabinet set to put reorganisation on hold

  • 1 Comment

With the minority Conservative government vulnerable to backbench revolts, potentially politically complex reorganisation looks likely to be placed far down the list of priorities in the short term at least.

Before the election, Local Government Association chair Lord Porter (Con) told LGC Theresa May would need a Commons majority of at least 50 seats to get proposals through.

MPs have always been significant players in reorganisation bids but they are not set to become pivotal as the government anxiously balances backbench interests.

A recent intervention by sceptical Christchurch MP Chrisopher Chope (Con) was said to have led to a decision being delayed on the ‘Future Dorset’ proposal.

Lord Porter said reorganisation is now very much “off the table” as it is too “politically toxic” to dela with.

Despite communities secretary Sajid Javid’s backing for reorganisation, including praise for Buckinghamshire’s single unitary proposal, few expect him to be able to elevate the agenda.

Policy survival rating: 3/10

thumbs down

thumbs down

 

 

 

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • It may lead to the agreement of a clear and consistent framework for local government reorganisation - to everyone's benefit.

    However, the big risk remains that all difficult decisions are avoided - such as this - despite the fact that it could cost the country £3bn of potential savings. Similarly, not evaluating and refocusing the budget for universal free school meals for infants will cost £4bn (for good or ill). But already the existence of a minority government could have cost taxpayers £7bn.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.