Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Chief: Ministers must take the lead on reorganisation

  • Comment

The government should show some leadership and “grasp” the issue of reorganisation in two-tier areas, according to the outgoing chief executive of Blackburn with Darwen BC.

The unitary is one of four councils that recently submitted a request to government to set up an East Lancashire unitary council.

Harry Catherall, who retires at the end of April, told LGC Lancashire CC was “too big” and should be split into three unitaries.

“I do not agree with the two-tier system anywhere in the country. I think the government should grasp it once and for all,” he said.

While the current government has given the go ahead to reorganisation where all partners agree, it has proven reluctant to force the issue if any object.

Mr Catherall said: “It needs government to make that decision because it’s Christmas and turkeys and all that.”

He described the two-tier system as “confusing and inefficient” and not understood, not only by the public, but also by “very experienced public servants”.

“I spend a lot of my time explaining to the NHS and public sector that to get upstream [and reduce demand] you need to engage with your district councils,” he said.

Mr Catherall was part of the senior team that oversaw Blackburn with Darwen’s unitarisation in 1998. However, he said the council was now “too small” to face the current challenges of austerity.

He said scrapping the two-tier system would save “significant resources” for local government but also the wider public sector by allowing for a “real place-based approach” to service delivery, stripping out any duplication.

“In local government itself it would save millions. It’s therefore wrong we’re not doing it already,” he said.


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.