Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

County advised to drop expenses case against former leader

  • 1 Comment

Essex CC’s audit committee has advised against pursuing its disgraced former leader for bills run up on council credit cards.

The committee’s chair Susan Barker (Con) said legal advice showed that pursuing the case against Lord Hanningfield would have an “uncertain chances of success”, and require considerable commitment of officers’ time.

A report to the committee did not say how much it would have sought from Lord Hanningfield, but referred to an invoice for £50,689.24 sent to him by Essex CC in June last year, to which no response was received. It said officers felt this had been “reasonable to regard as potentially recoverable”.

Cllr Barker said: “It is with huge regret that, having taken account of the legal advice and the advice of our external auditors, we feel we have no alternative but to recommend that no further action be taken in this matter.

“We recognise that the council now has robust governance arrangements in place and operates in a much more open and transparent environment. We are confident that this sort of extravagant and unreasonable expenditure does not, and would not, take place today.”

Lord Hanningfield (Con) was leader of Essex from 2000-10. He was prosecuted over his House of Lords expense claims in 2011 when he was jailed for nine months.

He was later that year arrested over alleged fraud concerning his expenses in Essex but in 2012 police took no action.

In May, he was suspended by the House of Lords for a year – the highest penalty it can impose – after further abuses of its expenses system, including money that the peer said was for the care of his dog.




  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • What debt recovery action never involves “uncertain chances of success”. It is a disgrace and a green light for those who wish to default on what is owed to the County. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that Conservative councillors are reluctant to take action against their own kind - even a convicted criminal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.