Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Legal staff call for stronger sanctions to tackle councillor misconduct

  • 1 Comment

The majority of council lawyers fear they no longer have the powers they need to tackle serious misconduct among elected members, an LGC survey has found.

Misconduct graphic

Legal staff call for stronger sanctions to tackle councillor misconduct

Survey finds Standards Board abolition has left monitoring officers in a weaker position

The survey of council legal teams, carried out in association with Lawyers in Local Government, asked whether the abolition of the Standards Board five years ago had left them with the tools they needed to keep behaviour in check. Of 235 respondents 60% answered ‘no’.

The Standards Board oversaw the national code of conduct for elected members and investigated claims of inappropriate behaviour until it was scrapped in 2012 by then communities secretary Eric Pickles. Though it could not impose sanctions itself, the board could refer cases back to the relevant council, which could suspend members for six months, or to the Adjudication Panel, which could disqualify members for up to five years.

Councils no longer have to appoint standards committees or adhere to the code, but they may do either voluntarily. They cannot suspend or disqualify members.

Last year Dame Louise Casey, then director-general of the Casey Review at the Department for Communities & Local Government, claimed the abolition of the board had “emasculated” monitoring officers.

legal big number

legal big number

Survey respondents, around a third of whom were monitoring officers or deputies, called for “a single national code of conduct for councillors” and “more effective sanctions, including suspension and disqualification”.

Helen Lynch, acting monitoring officer and legal services manager at Coventry City Council, told LGC the new regime provides more flexibility to deal with low-level poor conduct more quickly – but she said stronger sanctions were needed in more serious cases.

She highlighted a case at Rotherham MBC which has led the council to raise concerns with DCLG about sanctions.

“A councillor had been convicted of indecent assault on a woman at a council event, but he didn’t receive a custodial sentence of three months or more, so he was not automatically disqualified,” Ms Lynch said.

”Had he not resigned, he could have continued. The council had no mechanism by which to make him stand down.”

Ms Lynch added accountability at the ballot box was not necessarily a strong enough deterrent as elections may not be held for several years after a breach of the code and parish councillors often serve unopposed for several terms.

Graeme McDonald, director of the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives & Senior Managers, said the abolition of the Standards Board and the Audit Commission, the removal of designated independent persons protections for statutory officers and the decline of employment rights such as the cap on exit payments. Together they “left officers in a weaker position when speaking truth to power”.

He added these factors were behind Solace’s creation of a code of ethics for senior managers.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • "the tools they needed to keep behaviour in check" it's not the job of Monitoring Officers to keep the behaviour of councillors in check - and it wasn't under the old standards regime. Council solicitors provide advice to the council, the electorate and the press are there to keep councillors behaviour under review.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.