Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
By Daniel Martin ...
By Daniel Martin

Health secretary John Reid has said a third-term Labour government would not 'slash' the numbers of primary care trusts and strategic health authorities.

He said that while some reorganisation would take place after the election, a Labour government would work with managers towards 'gradual' change, in accordance with the wishes of those on the front line.

NHS chief executive Nigel Crisp has already indicated that PCT and SHA numbers will reduce. There has also been speculation that after the election a Labour government might announce a timetable to reduce the number of SHAs to nine, in line with regional government offices.

The Department of Health has already earmarked millions of pounds of efficiency savings in Whitehall and in arm's-length bodies under the Gershon review.

Labour's manifesto, launched last week, promised to release a further£250m to the front line via 'streamlining' and to 'ensure it is possible for the NHS to change the way in which it organises its services as quickly as possible'.

Asked about plans to rationalise SHAs and PCTs to this end, Mr Reid told Health Service Journal: 'I wouldn't be prescriptive about the number of PCTs or SHAs. I think we want to do things gradually and see things develop in a style which is in accordance with what people at the front line really want. If there is an evolution so that PCTs share some of the back-room functions that's fine.'

The health secretary said a future Labour government would 'allow more of the development of PCTs in accordance with the wishes of those involved in PCTs themselves'.

He continued: 'Up to this point we've been saying no to any mergers, to any rationalisation, no to any attempt to bring together back-room facilities, so we're prepared to be more flexible on that and to allow both PCTs and other aspects of the middle organisation to develop in a more efficient way.

'But there will be no slashing of these in a false attempt to cut frontline expenditure which will only end up with all the tasks they do being thrown onto frontline staff like doctors and nurses.'

Mr Reid contrasted Labour's plans to allow flexibility with Conservative plans to 'slash to zero all targets, get rid of PCTs and get rid of all SHAs, 'which he said would 'amount to the real destruction of frontline services'.

On devolving all commissioning to GPs he said: 'What happens under the Tory plans is that the doctors who are already hard pressed meeting demands of today's patients are going to have all that commissioning thrown on top of them with not one penny compensation.

'On SHAs, the savings envisaged must mean not only getting rid of the personnel but all of the training functions, so all of the training and infection control would be destroyed.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.