Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The electoral service provided by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames is good but has uncertain prospects for...
The electoral service provided by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames is good but has uncertain prospects for improvement, according to an independent report released today by the Audit Commission.

The Audit Commission inspection team gave the service two stars* because voters are generally satisfied with the service they receive. The council has also put into place a number of initiatives aimed at increasing voter turn-out.

Roy Irwin, regional director, London Region Inspection Service, said: 'The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames provides a good electoral service which aims to increase voter turn-out and gives high priority to the needs of voters with disabilities. However the council needs to explore alternative voting methods that users have indicated they would like to see put in place.'

The inspection report highlights a number of key strengths:

- the council considers the needs of people with disabilities as a priority and a number of arrangements are in place to make completion of 'A' Form and voting easier.

- there is a significant amount of outreach work undertaken to raise the profile of the electoral process including contacting young people, targeting hard to reach groups and effective internal partnership working

- the council is in the top quartile for percentage turn-out at local elections.

However, inspectors also found weaknesses:

- one polling station which is unsuitable for people with a disability continues to be used

- public notice-boards are not seen by voters as effective as they might be

- the council did not agree to a proposal to implement a pilot scheme which would have piloted alternative methods of voting although voters had clearly indicated that this was their preference,

To help the service improve, inspectors made a number of recommendations, including:

- the council should seek another venue for the unsuitable polling station that is still being used.

- consideration should be given to the provision of alternative methods of voting in response to user concerns

- develop closer working links with the press and public relations department to ensure more effective publicity for the service.

The electoral service is based in the chief executive's department and is provided by three staff which is supplemented by temporary staff at election times. The service has a statutory responsibility for the conduct of elections and the preparation of the Register of Electors.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.