Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Officers' union MPO has attacked proposals put forward by employers for cutting back on early and ill-health retire...
Officers' union MPO has attacked proposals put forward by employers for cutting back on early and ill-health retirement as 'a way to sack people cheaply'.

The United Kingdom Steering Committee on pensions, which represents local government employers' interests, is consulting councils on ways to improve the management of retirement in local government.

The proposals are based on the views of a working party of finance, personnel, pension administration and medical professionals (LGC, 20 September).

'All this is basically an attack on the level of compensation being paid by local authority employers to staff who loose their jobs through redundancy,' said MPO pensions adviser Cliff Crook.

He said restrictions on early and ill- health retirement would lead to more compulsory redundancies, and among younger staff. This is because their compensation payments tend to be cheaper, and compensation is usually based on length of service.

The incidence of early retirement has increased dramatically over the past decade and put pressure on council pension funds. A survey of 15 funds by financial consultants William M Mercer found only 19% of people now retire at the normal age.

Both the DoE and the Audit Commission are scrutinising early retirement practice in councils.

In a consultation paper published this week the UKSC points out that in some councils half of those retiring do so on ill-health grounds, while in others only a fifth do.

The paper says this is probably due to 'different management practices' rather than factors such as stress.

Most of the measures proposed by the UKSC do not require legislation. They range from encouraging councils todetect and prevent stress, which can lead to early retirement, and significantly reducing pensions incases where staff find other work after leaving council employment on health grounds.

Staff who find employment in local government after claiming an ill-health pension have their pension cut if their new earnings push their total income above the level of their old salary.

The UKSC has suggested extending this practice so that it applies to all post-retirement earnings, including private sector income.

Staff can take early retirement, with a bumped-up pension as compensation, if they are made redundant or leave in the interests of the efficient exercise of the authority's functions.

Councils could be advised to avoid the maximum compensation under the new guidelines, which some councils routinely pay in redundancy cases.

Local government now employs some 350,000 fewer staff than 20 years ago, and the UKSC recognises that early retirement has been 'extremely useful' as a management tool to make implementing staff cuts easier.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.