Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Stephen Joseph, executive director of Transport 2000 today challenged the government to combine tranport and planni...
Stephen Joseph, executive director of Transport 2000 today challenged the government to combine tranport and planning needs in its Transport White paper later this month.

Speaking at the Royal Town Planning Institute's national planning conference in Bournemouth, Mr Joseph said that previous good intentions had been undermined by inadequate legislation.

'PPG13 was good, but it was only half the story,' he told planners. 'It offered some clear directions to the planning system on reducing the need to travel, locating to new development where it could be easily accessed by public transport or on foot and bike.

'Backed up by some clear decisions on appeals, it has succeeded in slowing down and in some sectors halting the dash to out of town car-based facilities.

'But what was always missing was a clear transport strategy to back up and support the planning policies.'

Among the factors running counter to PPG13 were a large trunk road building programme; traffic management giving priority to vehicles over people; a deregulated and privatised public transport network 'starved of investment over many years'; tax relief for company cars; and a fall in motoring costs in real terms.

Mr Joseph welcomed predictions that the Transport White Paper would include:

- Local transport plans to fit with development plans

- Some reregulation of buses

- A strategic rail authority

- Review of company car tax system (abolition of free fuel has already been announced

- Change in traffic priorities to favour pedestrians, cyclists and buses

- Taxation powers for non-residential parking

But questions remained including whether private and public funding priorities follow policy?

'Will government - central and local - get its own house in order by taking account of the extra travel (and wider social costs) generated by centralisation and closures of hospitals, schools, magistrates courts etc?' he asked.

'Will senior planning officers give up their own parking spaces and cut their own car travel as part of green commuting, or will they just tell everyone else to do so?

'Will central government support councils adopting restraint policies against resistance from the AA and chambers of commerce, or will it leave them to twist in the wind?

'What will be done to eliminate or at least reduce competition between authorities to attract car-based development and to stop competition undermining restraint policies?'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.