Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The Royal Town Planning Institute remains convinced that present policy will not produce affordable housing at the ...
The Royal Town Planning Institute remains convinced that present policy will not produce affordable housing at the level required to meet projected needs.

Commenting on the draft revision of Circular 13/96, Planning and Affordable Housing, the institute believes a more positive approach is required.

Jon Morris, convenor of the RTPI's housing panel, said the institute welcomed the review of the circular, which proposed:

-- a reduction in the minimum size thresholds

-- a clearer definition of the role of affordable housing

-- clarification of the way in which financial or other contributions should be used

But he said: 'This draft does not address the wider relationship between the development planning system and the provision of affordable housing.

'The current arrangements have developed in a piecemeal fashion, which has allowed neither the planning system nor developers to play their most positive roles.'

The institute is also concerned that the revised advice continues to underplay the importance of the regional planning guidance and structure plans in establishing total housing need as a basis for striking a balance between market and affordable housing at district level.

Jon Morris said: 'Establishing quotas for affordable housing at district level would allow local plans to make site specific provision, increase certainty, and avoid the ad hoc, site-by-site basis of negotiating present provision.

'The institute does not support nationally prescribed thresholds, below which it is inappropriate to seek to negotiate the provision of affordable housing.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.