Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Scientists from the Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health and Greater Glasgow Health Board have wa...
Scientists from the Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health and Greater Glasgow Health Board have warned that radiation from mobile phone masts could pose a serious risk to public health, reports The Scotsman (p4).

The spread of masts and base sites around the country, combined with continuing growth in mobile phone use, constitutes an 'enormous natural experiment' with human beings as guinea pigs, they said.

The scientists insisted that there is a growing body of evidence that a number of conditions from short-term memory loss to cancer could be caused, or at least made worse, by the radiaion from the phone masts.

They are calling for new rules to limit where masts should be placed, with sites close to or on top of schools ruled out.

Giving evidence to parliament's transport and environment committee yesterday, Dr Colin Ramsay a consultant epidemiologist at SCIEH, said it was time the precautionary principle was employed to regulate the positioning of masts.

Dr Helen Irvine, a consultant at the GGHB, advised several local authorities earlier this year that health issues were enough to warrant a precautionary approach to siting future mobile phone masts.

She told the committee: 'Tobacco, asbestos and the processing of food ... three big examples to teach us that we need to be more careful.'

But the National Radiological Protection Board, the government's official advisers on radioactive pollution, said emissions from masts were well within safety limits and that they had no scientific grounds for restricting their spread.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.