Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Scottish councils have laid down a marker to their English and Welsh counterparts by launching a legal challenge to...
Scottish councils have laid down a marker to their English and Welsh counterparts by launching a legal challenge to the government's guidance on the conduct of CCT.

South Lanarkshire Council, with the backing of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, has lodged a petition for a judicial review of the guidance in the Court of Session.

It will argue that scottish secretary Michael Forsyth has exceeded his powers by imposing legal duties on local councils which are inconsistent with primary


The case will be heard on 22 November. If South Lanarkshire is successful, it will then be open to an English council to mount a similar challenge in the English courts.

Keith Geddes, president of COSLA, was keen to stress that the case was not about councils' relationships with the private sector. Instead, he described the issue as one of important constitutional principle.

'We do not believe that a secretary of state can decide to change the meaning of the law to suit his own political ends,' he said. 'If local government does not stand firm, this particular issue will simply be the thin end of the wedge.'

However, Scottish councils also hope legal victory would knock out key sections of the CCT guidance issued in near identical form in the UK on 2 April this year.

These required councils to consult the market as part of a pre-tendering exercise for all future CCT contracts and to take into account any representations from the market about the way in which work is selected or packaged for competition.

Acting on advice from Andrew Hardie QC, South Lanarkshire will argue that this has the effect of imposing a positive obligation on councils, in contradiction to the 1980 and 1988 CCT acts which impose only the negative obligation that councils must avoid conduct which is anti-competitive in nature.

Lesley Courcouf, assistant secretary of the Association of Metropolitan Authorities, said that English councils were very interested in the outcome of the case.

'We feel it is up to the private sector to apply for work when it is advertised,' she said. 'Over the years ministers have got more interested in councils creating markets - to the extent that we are almost at the stage where if a council fails to get a good response to a tender advertisement, that in itself is anti-competitive.'

Newcastle MBC had considered mounting its own challenge to the guidance but had decided not to take action.

Director of administration Henry Warne said the council was now waiting with interest to the regulations on extending white-collar CCT due to be issued shortly.

Jon Harris, head of policy for COSLA, said member authorities were being circulated with details of the legal challenge as LGC went to press. COSLA would co-ordinate support across Scotland.

South Lanarkshire has already successfully challenged the scottish secretary once in the courts this year over his plans to lift a CCT moratorium from January 1997.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.