Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ofsted challenge process almost a 'kangaroo court'

  • 1 Comment

The children’s services watchdog has been fiercely criticised by a council chief and consultant during a child protection debate at the Local Government Association conference today.

Ofsted inspectors were accused of visiting authorities with their minds already made up about the quality of councils’ services and dealing with rating reviews like a “kangaroo court”.

These claims were levelled against the inspectorate in a strongly worded speech by Amanda Kelly, a director of Impower, a consultancy which advises many authorities on how to improve their children’s services.

Ms Kelly said Ofsted in its current state “isn’t a force for good.  I don’t think it is protecting children. I don’t feel confident that we can put our trust in Ofsted; we do need to look at alternative models”.

She described the “burden” of the inspection process as “huge” and questioned whether the current means of official inspections could be considered “value for money” in a time of austerity.

“Councils put extra staff on the ground to get ready for Ofsted and pay a lot to consultants to prepare to get ready for inspections,” she told delegates. “It stops people doing their jobs.”

Ms Kelly also criticised what she described as a “hypothesis-driven” approach to inspection, adopted by some Ofsted officials.

“It feels like inspectors have already decided the outcome before they pitch up,” she added.

“They have done their analysis beforehand, come with a view and set out to prove it.”

She described the complaints procedure – in which councils can challenge inspection results - as “as close to a kangaroo court as I’ve come across”.

“It felt as if they weren’t listening. It seemed like they came back and hit a bit harder. They were defensive.”

Jo Miller, chief executive of Doncaster MBC, told delegates the “crude categories” of Ofsted ratings were an “oversimplification” which fed reputation damaging media headlines.

She urged local authorities to come up with their own credible “self-improvement” regime to replace the one currently operated by Ofsted.

“Why are we waiting for Ofsted to tell us the state of our services? Why allow residents to see the state of our services through that Ofsted lens?”

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Another blow to Ofsted. Next a Wilshaw resignation in the Autumn?
    Use of private consultants and ex-teachers of varying pedigree plus a tendency to inspect via desktop to minimise costs. Time for a thorough review of Ofsted!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.