Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

MPs urge duty to collaborate on parks

  • 1 Comment

Councils should be given a statutory duty to collaborate with health and wellbeing boards on strategies for parks and green spaces if voluntary means fail.

That call has come from MPs on the communities and local government committee in their report Public Parks.

They said ministers should issue “very clear guidance” to councils to work with boards and “if the guidance does not prove effective …or the joint strategies which are produced do not prove effective in raising the profile and priority afforded to parks, the minister should consider legislating” to impose a statutory duty.

Plans could include using parks to help promote healthy lifestyles, reduce social exclusion, and manage flood risk

Budget cuts had hit 92% of council parks departments in recent years, the report said, though this varied from a 97% cut at Newcastle City Council to 30% at Stockport MBC.

“Many of those who responded to our call for evidence suggested that a statutory duty to provide parks would increase the priority afforded to them during local authority budget allocation,” the committee noted. But it rejected this saying it “could be burdensome and complex”.

MPs were though disturbed by the perils facing parks. Evidence submitted showed “the strength and depth of concern which people and communities across the country have about the effect of budget reductions on their treasured parks and green spaces”. 

The report added: “We share these concerns. We too are worried about the potential deterioration or even loss of a service which is of great value, both as an amenity, and for the contribution which parks make to wider policy objectives including community cohesion, improvement of air quality, and biodiversity.”

Ian Stephens (Ind), chair of the Local Government Association’s culture, tourism and sport board, said: “Ensuring parks remain open and accessible to our communities is a key concern for councils.

“However, over the previous parliament central government funding for councils was reduced by 40% in real terms and they continue to experience funding pressures.”

A Heritage Lottery Fund report last September warned that many councils had only a limited understanding of their park services.

The Department for Communities & Local Government has been contacted for comment.

 

  • 1 Comment

Related files

Readers' comments (1)

  • The crisis in Parks is very real given the huge cuts that local authorities have faced since 2010. APSE's state of the market survey's show that for services such as Parks the reality is that cuts have been even higher than the headline figures for Council's as a whole.

    The contribution that Parks make to health and wellbeing is well known and the idea of a duty to collaborate with health and wellbeing boards is interesting but only if there is a recognition of the fact that Parks could be part of a prevention not cure approach and funding is provided on an invest to save basis from public health budgets.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.