Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Council rejects public health specialist for top job

  • 1 Comment

The appointment of the most high profile executive director responsible for public health who comes from a non-public health background has been announced.

375_lgc_hsj_reporting

Steve Gross has been appointed Lancashire County Council’s executive director of adult services and public health, combining the two roles.

Mr Gross, a social worker by background, is the council’s director of commissioning, having previously been its director of adult social care.

LGC reported in April that the council had to rethink its plans to combine the roles as director of public health and adult social care after failing to find a suitable candidate.

Council leader Jennifer Mein said: “Combining the council’s adult services and public health responsibilities presents a tremendous opportunity to improve the lives of people in Lancashire and I have every confidence in Steve’s ability to ensure we make a success of it.”

John Ashton, president of the Faculty of Public Health, accused Lancashire of “driving a coach and horses through the system of specialist training for public health specialists”, which provided the knowledge of statistics and evidence-based commissioning required of directors.

He continued: “This is a really serious blow. An untrained internal candidate has been selected for this job over some of the leading public health people nationally.”

Professor Ashton said Lancashire’s move was part of the “dumbing down” of the status of public health professionals nationally. He warned that people with a background in social care had more experience of “remedial work”, rather than having a “pre-emptive, upstream” focus.

Another director of public health, who did not want to be identified, told LGC’s sister title Health Service Journal they feared what would happen if a director without a public health background had to deal with an outbreak of meningitis or legionella – a scenario for which they had no training.

“If you have someone in that position with no training in public health, the council puts itself into a very risky position,” the director said.

The director said they would be concerned if a public health specialist was appointed at a lower level when it was the executive director who would be required to argue the case for public health to other council directorates, councillors and outside bodies.

“It’s really short-sighted – you won’t have someone with [a public health] background who is able to influence planning decisions on the council and the commissioning of leisure facilities.

“Decisions like this undermine the move of public health into local government.”

Public health responsibility sat with the NHS before moving to local government in April under the terms of the Health Act 2012.

It is understood that Telford and Wrekin Council has adopted a similar structure to Lancashire after its director of public health left the council soon after public health functions moved from the NHS. Paul Taylor, formerly an assistant director with a social care background, holds the joint role on the authority.

Mr Gross said: “I am delighted to have been offered this post and excited about the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead. I am absolutely confident that we will use the resources we have available to deliver the best possible outcomes for the citizens of Lancashire.”

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Wouldn't the Adult Care part of that budget dwarf the public health element? This seems like a jobs for the boys whinge by interested parties. Non-specialists can commission and manage a wide range of services - mad to argue that someone appointed to a strategic role also needs personal expertise in how to deliver operationally. Like arguing the Permanent Private Secretary to the MOD needs to be able to drive a tank.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.