Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

LGA withdraws support for 'disappointing' BCF guidance

  • 1 Comment

Controversial new guidance on how the £2bn allocated to social care must be spent shows the government has bowed down to pressure from the NHS, which resented the money being given to councils, according to the chair of the Local Government Association’s community wellbeing board.

The Better Care Fund planning guidance for 2017-19, published on Monday, states that councils must use their allocations to help meet a target to reduce delayed transfers of care from hospital to free up between 2,000 and 3,000 hospital beds across England.

Performance will be judged on a range of metrics focused on the interface of health and social care and the Care Quality Commission will inspect areas with the worst outcomes. The government will then consider withdrawing funding to councils assessed to be performing badly.

Izzi Seccombe (Con) told LGC the LGA “had no choice” but to withdraw support for the guidance as prioritising delayed transfers over other aspects of the social care system represented a “sudden shift in focus” that was “extremely disappointing”.

She added: “[The guidance] means we are going backwards in attempts to futureproof social care for an ageing population.

“The pressure has undoubtedly come from NHS England. Collectively government has complied with that request.

“[The NHS] wanted more money and thought [the £2bn] should have gone to them. There was resentment that it came to us and they want to control how it is spent.”

Cllr Seccombe said councils will now be unable to improve services and deliver efficiencies in order to make the whole social care system sustainable and reduce pressure on the NHS.

She also said NHS control over spending would disrupt relationships between councils and health bodies, hindering efforts to integrate services through sustainability and transformation plans.

She added: “It does not feel we have parity with the NHS yet we touch people’s lives in the community far more than the NHS.

“We love the NHS but it is inefficient. It is a dinosaur and it hasn’t changed. The government has put money under control of the NHS without giving us the capacity for change.”

The planning guidance states that any money withdrawn from poorly performing councils would remain with local government.

Cllr Seccombe said this implied money could be taken away from struggling councils and passed on to those judged to be performing well.

She added that there is often dispute between local government and NHS trusts over recorded responsibility for, and volume of, delayed transfers which could lead to councils being judged on inaccurate data.


  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Should that be "inaccurate data"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.